An LTM Specialist receives a request to monitor the network path through a member, but NOT the member itself.
Which monitor option should the LTM Specialist enable or configure?
An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting a problem on an eCommerce website. The user browses the online store using port 80, adding items to the shopping cart. The user then clicks the "Checkout" button on the site, which redirects the user to port 443 for the checkout process. Suddenly, the user's shopping cart is shown as empty. The shopping cart data is stored in memory on the server, and the default source address persistence profile is used on both virtual servers.
How should the LTM Specialist resolve this issue?
-- Exhibit -





-- Exhibit --
Refer to the exhibits.
An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting an application configured on an LTM device on a one-armed configuration. The application is NOT working through the LTM device but does work when accessed directly via the application servers. The virtual server 192.168.1.211:443 is configured to SNAT using the address 192.168.1.144 and references a pool with the member 192.168.10.80:443. No Client or Server SSL profiles are associated. The LTM Specialist has collected two traffic captures to help determine the issue.
What is the problem with the configuration on the LTM device?
A high-availability (HA) pair configuration uses only the hardwire serial cable connection to determine device state. A power outage occurs to the PDU powering the active unit. The standby unit takes over the active role as expected.
How is the peer unit able to determine the active unit is unavailable?
What does the following iRule do?
when CLIENT_ACCEPTED {
if { [matchclass [IP::client_addr] equals WebClient1-Whitelist1] }{
#log local0. "Valid client IP: [IP::client_addr] - forwarding traffic"
#Pool WebClient1
} else {
log local0. "Invalid client IP: [IP::client_addr] - discarding"
discard
}
}