FreeQAs
 Request Exam  Contact
  • Home
  • View All Exams
  • New QA's
  • Upload
PRACTICE EXAMS:
  • Oracle
  • Fortinet
  • Juniper
  • Microsoft
  • Cisco
  • Citrix
  • CompTIA
  • VMware
  • ISC
  • SAP
  • EMC
  • PMI
  • HP
  • Salesforce
  • Other
  • Oracle
    Oracle
  • Fortinet
    Fortinet
  • Juniper
    Juniper
  • Microsoft
    Microsoft
  • Cisco
    Cisco
  • Citrix
    Citrix
  • CompTIA
    CompTIA
  • VMware
    VMware
  • ISC
    ISC
  • SAP
    SAP
  • EMC
    EMC
  • PMI
    PMI
  • HP
    HP
  • Salesforce
    Salesforce
  1. Home
  2. Fortinet Certification
  3. FCSS_LED_AR-7.6 Exam
  4. Fortinet.FCSS_LED_AR-7.6.v2026-08-19.q93 Dumps
  • ««
  • «
  • …
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • »
Download Now

Question 81

APs have been manually configured to connect to FortiGate over an IPsec network, and FortiGate successfully detects and authorizes them. However, the APs remain unmanaged because FortiGate is unable to establish a CAPWAP tunnel with them. What configuration change can resolve this issue and enable FortiGate to establish the CAPWAP tunnel over the IPsec connection?

Correct Answer: A
When FortiAP devices connect across an IPsec network, FortiGate must treat them as being reached over an indirect Layer 3 transport rather than a local CAPWAP path. Enabling the mpls- connection option in the AP profile allows CAPWAP management traffic to operate correctly across that routed IPsec path, which lets FortiGate fully manage the remote APs.
insert code

Question 82

Connectivity tests are being performed on a newly configured VLAN. The VLAN is configured on a FortiSwitch device that is managed by FortiGate. During testing, it is observed that devices within the VLAN can successfully ping FortiGate. and FortiGate can also ping these devices.
Inter-VLAN communication is working as expected. However, devices within the same VLAN are unable to communicate with each other.
What could be causing this issue?

Correct Answer: A
Observed behavior:
* Devices in the VLANcan ping FortiGate# gateway reachability OK.
* FortiGatecan ping devicesin that VLAN # return path OK.
* Inter-VLAN routingworks # FortiGate's L3 and policies are fine.
* Devices in the same VLAN cannot ping each other# problem is on theL2 switching plane, not L3.
On FortiSwitch (managed by FortiGate), there is a feature calledAccess VLAN(sometimes described in NAC
/dynamic segmentation context):
* WhenAccess VLANis enabled on a VLAN, the switchdoes not perform normal L2 forwarding between hosts in that VLAN.
* Instead, all traffic from endpoints in that VLAN isforced upstream to FortiGate, as if every frame were destined for the gateway.
* This is used for designs where you wantall intra-VLAN traffic inspected by the firewall, implementing micro-segmentation.
Resulting behavior:
* Host # FortiGate: works (frames are forwarded to FortiGate).
* FortiGate # Host: works (routed back).
* Host A # Host B (same VLAN):
* Frame from A goes to FortiGate.
* FortiGate seessource and destination in same subnet; depending on policy, it may drop or not have a policy allowing that traffic.
* Even if allowed, certain designs still break pure L2 expectations.
In the exam scenario, the key point is:
IfAccess VLAN is enabled,local L2 communication within that VLAN is disabled, so hosts in the same VLAN cannot communicate directly.
That perfectly explains:
* Same VLAN hosts can't ping each other
* But they can both reach FortiGate and beyond
Why the other options are less likely / incorrect
* B. FortiSwitch MAC address table is missing entries
* If MAC table were empty/bad,nothingin that VLAN would work properly, including pinging FortiGate.
* C. FortiGate ARP table is missing entries
* Then FortiGate couldn't ping the devices either; but it can.
* D. Native VLAN misconfigured on ports
* That would affect connectivity to FortiGate too, not only host-to-host.
insert code

Question 83

A network administrator connects a new FortiGate to the network, allowing it to automatically discover and register with FortiManager. What occurs after FortiGate retrieves the FortiManager address?

Correct Answer: D
After discovering and registering with FortiManager, the FortiGate remains in a pending state until it is manually authorized on FortiManager, which allows the management relationship to be fully established.
insert code

Question 84

Why is it critical to maintain NTP synchronization between FortiGate and FortiSwitch when FortiLink is configured?

Correct Answer: D
NTP synchronization ensures both devices share the same accurate time reference, which is essential for consistent logging, correct authentication processes, and reliable correlation of events across FortiGate and FortiSwitch.
insert code

Question 85

Refer to the exhibit.

Which shows the WTP profile configuration.
The AP profile is assigned to two FAP-231F APs that are installed in an open plan area.
The first AP has 32 clients associated with the 5 GHz radios and 22 clients associated with the 2.4 GHz radio.
The second AP has 12 clients associated with the 5 GHz radios and 20 clients associated with the 2.4 GHz radio.
A dual-band-capable client enters the area near the first AP and the first AP measures the new client at - 3 3 dBm signal strength. The second AP measures the new client at -43 dBm signal strength.
If the new client attempts to conned to the student 01 wireless network, which AP radio will the client be associated with?

Correct Answer: B
This question combines two FortiAP behaviors shown in the study guide:
* AP handoff for load balancing
* Frequency handoff for band steering to 5 GHz
From the WTP profile in the exhibit:
* set handoff-rssi 30
* set handoff-sta-thresh 30
The LAN Edge 7.6 Architect study guide explains AP handoff like this:
"If the number of clients is already at the defined threshold, new clients will be redirected to join the least busy nearby AP." It also states: "The handoff-sta-thresh parameter defines the threshold value that triggers the handoff protocol for new clients." So, because the first AP 5 GHz radio already has 32 clients, it is above the threshold of 30, meaning AP handoff can be considered.
However, the same extract adds an important condition:
"The handoff-rssi threshold defined in the AP profile applies when a handed-off client tries to connect to the second AP. The client ' s signal strength must be equal to or greater than the defined RSSI value on the new AP." The second AP measures the client at -43 dBm. Based on the configured handoff RSSI threshold of 30, the second AP does not satisfy the required signal condition for the handoff target, so FortiGate does not redirect the client there.
Now consider band selection. The study guide explains frequency handoff:
"Frequency handoff is a band steering technique that FortiGate uses to encourage clients to use the 5 GHz frequency instead of the 2.4 GHz." It also says:
"When a client tries to connect, FortiGate checks whether it can support 5 GHz and, if so, how good the signals are. If a client supports the 5 GHz frequency and the signal is strong enough to connect, FortiGate ignores the client's requests to join the network on 2.4 GHz until the request times out. The client will then automatically try to join the same network using 5 GHz." Because the client is dual-band capable and the first AP sees it at a very strong -33 dBm, FortiGate will steer it to 5 GHz on the first AP.
Why the other options are incorrect:
A). Incorrect. The study guide says frequency handoff encourages dual-band clients to use 5 GHz instead of
2.4 GHz when the 5 GHz signal is strong enough
C). Incorrect. Even though the second AP 5 GHz radio has fewer clients, AP handoff only occurs if the target AP meets the configured handoff RSSI requirement. The study guide explicitly makes that a condition D). Incorrect. 2.4 GHz is not preferred here. The study guide specifically says FortiGate uses frequency handoff to encourage 5 GHz for dual-band-capable clients Final verified conclusion:
The client will associate with the first AP 5 GHz radio because:
* the client is dual-band capable
* FortiGate prefers 5 GHz through frequency handoff
* the first AP has the stronger signal at -33 dBm
* the second AP does not qualify as the handoff target under the configured handoff RSSI condition
insert code
  • ««
  • «
  • …
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • »
[×]

Download PDF File

Enter your email address to download Fortinet.FCSS_LED_AR-7.6.v2026-08-19.q93 Dumps

Email:

FreeQAs

Our website provides the Largest and the most Latest vendors Certification Exam materials around the world.

Using dumps we provide to Pass the Exam, we has the Valid Dumps with passing guranteed just which you need.

  • DMCA
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
©2026 FreeQAs

www.freeqas.com materials do not contain actual questions and answers from Cisco's certification exams.