Is this how you should position switches in the ArubaOS-CX portfolio tor data center networks?
Solution: Deploy Aruba 83xx switches as core switches for very large three-tier data center networks.
A data center has a three-tier topology with ArubaOS-CX switches at each layer, is this a use case for implementing Virtual Switching Extension (VSX) at the core?
Solution: The aggregation layer operates at Layer 2 only, and the core provides Layer 2 and Layer 3 functions.
You ate using NetEdit to manage AruDaOS-CX switches. You want to deploy a standard conflg to the switches, but need the config to include a few device-specific settings such as hostname and IP address.
Is this what you should do?
Solution: Instead of using a standard configuration plan to deploy the configuration, create an auto config plan that uses scripts.
Can you attach this type of ArubaOS-CX interface to a VRF?
Solution: A physical interface using Layer 2 mode
Refer to the exhibit.
which shows the topology tot an Ethernet Ring Protection Switching (ERPS) solution.
Is this a valid design for the control and protected VLANs on the VSX fabric 1 switches?
Solution: Ring 1, instance 1:
control VLAN: 1000protected VLANs: 51-135 Ring l,Instance2:
control VLAN: 1001 protected VLANs: 136-220 Ring 2, Instance 1: control VLAN: 1000 protected VLANs: 181 -200 Ring 2, Instance 2: control VLAN: 1003 protected VLANs: 201 -220
