An information security manager determines there are a significant number of exceptions to a newly released industry-required security standard. Which of the following should be done NEXT?
Correct Answer: C
Assessing the consequences of noncompliance is the next step that should be done after determining that there are a significant number of exceptions to a newly released industry-required security standard. The information security manager should evaluate the potential impact and exposure of the organization due to the noncompliance with the security standard. The assessment should consider the legal, regulatory, contractual, and reputational implications of the noncompliance, as well as the likelihood and severity of the incidents or penalties that may result from the noncompliance. The assessment should also compare the cost and benefit of complying with the security standard versus accepting the risk of noncompliance. The assessment should provide the basis for making informed and rational decisions about how to address the noncompliance issue and prioritize the actions and resources needed to achieve compliance. Documenting risk acceptances, revising the organization's security policy, and conducting an information security audit are all possible actions that may be taken to address the noncompliance issue, but they are not the next steps that should be done. These actions should be performed after assessing the consequences of noncompliance, and based on the results and recommendations of the assessment. Documenting risk acceptances may be appropriate if the organization decides to accept the risk of noncompliance, and if the risk is within the risk appetite and tolerance of the organization. Revising the organization's security policy may be necessary if the organization decides to comply with the security standard, and if the policy needs to be updated to reflect the new requirements and expectations. Conducting an information security audit may be useful if the organization wants to verify the level of compliance and identify the gaps and weaknesses in the security controls and processes. Therefore, assessing the consequences of noncompliance is the next step that should be done after determining that there are a significant number of exceptions to a newly released industry-required security standard, as it helps the information security manager to understand the risk and impact of the noncompliance and to make informed and rational decisions about how to address it. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 43 1; CISM Practice Quiz 2
Question 87
Which of the following actions should be taken when an information security manager discovers that a hacker is foot printing the network perimeter?
Correct Answer: B
Explanation/Reference: Explanation: Information security should check the intrusion detection system (IDS) logs and continue to monitor the situation. It would be inappropriate to take any action beyond that. In fact, updating the IDS could create a temporary exposure until the new version can be properly tuned. Rebooting the router and enabling server trace routing would not be warranted.
Question 88
When customer data has been compromised, an organization should contact law enforcement authorities:
Correct Answer: D
Question 89
Which of the following is the FIRST phase in which security should be addressed in the development cycle of a project?
Correct Answer: D
Information security should be considered at the earliest possible stage. Security requirements must be defined before you enter into design specification, although changes in design may alter these requirements later on. Security requirements defined during system implementation are typically costly add-ons that are frequently ineffective. Application security testing occurs after security has been implemented.
Question 90
Which of the following is the BEST reason to separate short-term from long-term plans within an information security roadmap?
