Free Juniper JN0-694 Exam Dumps Questions & Answers

Referring to the exhibit, an administrator has configured dot1q-tunneling on the VLAN, but LLDP is not being tunneled.

What is causing the problem?

• A.  LLDP needs to be enabled as a protocol to tunnel.
• B.  LLDP tunneling only works on trunked interfaces.
• C.  LLDP needs to be disabled on the tunneling device.
• D.  LLDP can only be processed one hop away.

Referring to the exhibit, the prefix 3.3.3.3/32 is not in R1 's routing table. Which two configuration changes on R2 would resolve the problem? (Choose two.)

• A.  Option B
• B.  Option A
• C.  Option D
• D.  Option C

Your Junos device is dropping certain traffic flows, while allowing other traffic flows to pass
through the device unaffected.
Which CoS component is causing this problem?

• A.  RED
• B.  Rewrite rules
• C.  BA classification
• D.  MF classification

-- Exhibit -user@router# run show log ospf-test ... Jun 10 22:35:38.598494 OSPF sent Hello 10.100.0.1 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/0/3.1000 IFL 77
area 0.0.0.0) Jun 10 22:35:38.598520 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.100.1.2, area 0.0.0.0 Jun 10 22:35:38.598543 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x2, prio 128 Jun 10 22:35:38.598564 dead_ivl 32, DR 10.100.0.1, BDR 0.0.0.0 Jun 10 22:35:41.522956 OSPF periodic xmit from 10.200.26.1 to 224.0.0.5 (IFL
2684276196 area 0.0.0.1)
Jun 10 22:35:42.798220 OSPF rcvd Hello 10.100.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/0/3.1000 IFL 77
area 0.0.0.0)
Jun 10 22:35:42.798311 Version 2, length 48, ID 10.100.1.1, area 0.0.0.0
Jun 10 22:35:42.798334 checksum 0x0, authtype 0
Jun 10 22:35:42.798356 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x2, prio 128
Jun 10 22:35:42.798377 dead_ivl 40, DR 10.100.0.2, BDR 10.100.0.1
Jun 10 22:35:45.189034 OSPF rcvd Hello 10.100.0.2 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/0/3.1000 IFL 77 area 0.0.0.0) Jun 10 22:35:45.189097 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.100.1.1, area 0.0.0.0 Jun 10 22:35:45.189118 checksum 0x0, authtype 0 Jun 10 22:35:45.189140 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x2, prio 128 Jun 10 22:35:45.189162 dead_ivl 40, DR 10.100.0.2, BDR 0.0.0.0
Jun 10 22:35:45.196969 OSPF DR is 10.100.1.2, BDR is 0.0.0.0 Jun 10 22:35:45.197050 OSPF sent Hello 10.200.26.1 -> 224.0.0.5 (ge-1/0/0.0 IFL 69 area 0.0.0.1)
Jun 10 22:35:45.197076 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.100.1.2, area 0.0.0.1 Jun 10 22:35:45.197098 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 10, opts 0x2, prio 128 Jun 10 22:35:45.197119 dead_ivl 40, DR 10.200.26.1, BDR 0.0.0.0 Jun 10 22:35:46.746900 OSPF periodic xmit from 10.100.0.1 to 224.0.0.5 (IFL 2684276196
area 0.0.0.0) -- Exhibit -
Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, what is preventing the OSPF neighborship with two directly connected routers using interface ge-1/0/3 from reaching the full state?

• A.  dead interval mismatch
• B.  authentication type mismatch
• C.  hello interval mismatch
• D.  subnet mismatch

-- Exhibit -user@router> show ospf database
Area 0.0.0.1 Type ID Adv Rtr Seq Age Opt Cksum Len Router 172.24.255.1 172.24.255.1 0x800000d4 182 0x22 0x59f3 36 Router 172.24.255.2 172.24.255.2 0x800000d4 177 0x22 0x57f2 36 Router *172.24.255.4 172.24.255.4 0x800000dc 176 0x22 0x75fa 72 Network 172.24.124.2 172.24.255.2 0x80000007 177 0x22 0x7957 36 Summary 172.24.13.0 172.24.255.1 0x80000004 2370 0x22 0x3f62 28 Summary 172.24.23.0 172.24.255.1 0x80000002 471 0x22 0xdeb9 28 Summary 172.24.255.1 172.24.255.1 0x800000cb 2037 0x22 0x2bbb 28 Summary 172.24.255.2 172.24.255.2 0x800000cc 487 0x22 0x19ca 28 Summary 172.24.255.3 172.24.255.1 0x80000003 140 0x22 0xb2f9 28 OSPF AS SCOPE link state database Type ID Adv Rtr Seq Age Opt Cksum Len Extern *1.47.82.0 172.24.255.4 0x80000002 1037 0x22 0x4225 36 Extern *100.0.0.0 172.24.255.4 0x80000001 2643 0x22 0xfc88 36
user@router> show ospf neighbor Address Interface State ID Pri Dead
172.24.124.2 ge-0/0/1.0 Full 172.24.255.2 128 36
172.24.124.1 ge-0/0/1.0 Full 172.24.255.1 128 30
user@router> show ospf interface ge-0/0/1.0 extensive Interface State Area DR ID BDR ID Nbrs ge-0/0/1.0 PtToPt 0.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2 Type: P2MP, Address: 172.24.124.4, Mask: 255.255.255.0, MTU: 1500, Cost: 1 Adj count: 2 Hello: 10, DeaD. 40, ReXmit: 5, Not Stub Auth type: None Protection type: None Topology default (ID 0) -> Cost: 1
user@router> show route protocol ospf table inet.0
inet.0: 11133 destinations, 11135 routes (11133 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
224.0.0.5/32 *[OSPF/10] 1w0d 00:01:14, metric 1 MultiRecv -- Exhibit -
Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, why are the OSPF routes missing from the routing table for this router?

• A.  MTU mismatch with the neighbor
• B.  mismatching OSPF interface type with the neighbor
• C.  incorrect IP address configured on the interface
• D.  no Type 4 LSAs in the OSPF database