| Exam Code/Number: | JN0-696Join the discussion |
| Exam Name: | Security Support, Professional (JNCSP-SEC) |
| Certification: | Juniper |
| Question Number: | 36 |
| Publish Date: | Oct 13, 2026 |
|
Rating
100%
|
|
You are asked to troubleshoot a user communication problem. Users connected to the Trust zone cannot communicate with other devices connected to the same zone. These users are able to communicate with other devices in all other zones.
How should you resolve this problem?
-- Exhibit -{hold:node0} user@host1> show chassis cluster status Cluster ID. 1 Node Priority Status Preempt Manual failover
Redundancy group: 0 , Failover count: 0 node0 1 hold no no node1 0 lost n/a n/a {hold:node0}
user@host1> show configuration | no-more
system { host-name host1; root-authentication { encrypted-password "$1$KI99zGk6$MbYFuBbpLffu9tn2.sI7l1"; ## SECRET-DATA } name-server { 172.16.10.100; } services { ssh; telnet; web-management { http; } } syslog { user * { any emergency; } file messages { any any; authorization info; } file interactive-commands { interactive-commands any;
}
} } interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 10.210.14.131/26;
}
}
}
ge-0/0/8 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 172.16.1.1/24;
}
}
}
ge-0/0/9 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 172.16.10.1/24;
} } } }
security {
policies {
default-policy {
permit-all;
}
}
zones {
functional-zone management {
interfaces {
ge-0/0/0.0;
}
host-inbound-traffic {
system-services {
ssh;
telnet;
ping;
traceroute;
http;
snmp;
}
}
}
security-zone Trust {
host-inbound-traffic {
system-services {
any-service;
}
}
interfaces {
ge-0/0/9.0;
}
}
security-zone Untrust {
host-inbound-traffic {
system-services {
any-service;
}
}
interfaces {
ge-0/0/8.0;
}
}
}
}
{hold:node1} user@host2> show chassis cluster status Cluster ID. 1 Node Priority Status Preempt Manual failover
Redundancy group: 0 , Failover count: 0 node0 0 lost n/a n/a node1 1 hold no no
{hold:node1}
user@host2> show configuration | no-more
system { host-name host2; root-authentication { encrypted-password "$1$KI99zGk6$MbYFuBbpLffu9tn2.sI7l1"; ## SECRET-DATA } name-server { 172.16.10.100; } services { ssh; telnet; web-management { http; } } syslog { user * { any emergency; } file messages { any any; authorization info; } file interactive-commands {
interactive-commands any;
}
} } interfaces {
ge-0/0/0 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 10.210.14.132/26;
}
}
}
ge-0/0/8 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 172.16.1.1/24;
}
}
}
ge-0/0/9 {
unit 0 {
family inet {
address 172.16.10.1/24;
}
}
} }
security {
policies {
default-policy {
permit-all;
}
}
zones {
functional-zone management {
interfaces {
ge-0/0/0.0;
}
host-inbound-traffic {
system-services {
ssh;
telnet;
ping;
traceroute;
http;
snmp;
}
}
}
security-zone Trust {
host-inbound-traffic {
system-services {
any-service; } } interfaces { ge-0/0/9.0; } } security-zone Untrust { host-inbound-traffic { system-services { any-service; } } interfaces { ge-0/0/8.0; } } }
}
-- Exhibit -
Click the Exhibit button.
A user attempted to form a chassis cluster on an SRX240; however, the cluster did not form. While investigating the problem, you see the output shown in the exhibit.
What is causing the problem?
You have implemented AppTrack on your SRX Series device to track YouTube streaming video usage in your network. However, many of the YouTube videos that your users are watching are shorter than five minutes. You notice that the statistics for starting these short YouTube videos are not being recorded by AppTrack.
Which two actions would allow AppTrack to record the statistics for these sessions? (Choose two.)
-- Exhibit --
user@host> show configuration security utm
custom-objects {
url-pattern {
block-juniper {
value *.spammer.com;
}
}
custom-url-category {
blacklist {
value block-juniper;
}
}
}
feature-profile {
anti-spam {
address-blacklist block-juniper;
sbl {
profile myprofile {
no-sbl-default-server;
spam-action block;
}
}
}
}
utm-policy wildcard-policy {
anti-spam { smtp-profile myprofile; }
} -- Exhibit -
Click the Exhibit button.
You added a blacklist to your antispam policy to block any e-mails from the spammer.com domain. However, your users are complaining that they are still receiving spam e-mails from that domain. You run the utm test-string test and confirm that the blacklist is not working.
Referring to the exhibit, what is causing this problem?
-- Exhibit -
[edit security utm]
user@host# show
custom-objects { url-pattern { blocklist { value [ http://badsite.com http://blocksite.com ]; } acceptlist { value http://juniper.net; } } custom-url-category { blacklist { value blocklist; } whitelist { value acceptlist; } }
}
feature-profile { web-filtering { url-whitelist whitelist; url-blacklist blacklist; type juniper-local; juniper-local {
profile web-filter {
custom-block-message "Site is not allowed";
fallback-settings {
default log-and-permit;
}
}
}
}
}
utm-policy utm1 {
web-filtering {
http-profile web-filter;
}
}
-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
You set up Web filtering to allow employees to only access your internal website. You notice that employees are still able to reach websites outside of the blacklists.
Referring the exhibit, which parameter must be changed?