FreeQAs
 Request Exam  Contact
  • Home
  • View All Exams
  • New QA's
  • Upload
PRACTICE EXAMS:
  • Oracle
  • Fortinet
  • Juniper
  • Microsoft
  • Cisco
  • Citrix
  • CompTIA
  • VMware
  • ISC
  • SAP
  • EMC
  • PMI
  • HP
  • Salesforce
  • Other
  • Oracle
    Oracle
  • Fortinet
    Fortinet
  • Juniper
    Juniper
  • Microsoft
    Microsoft
  • Cisco
    Cisco
  • Citrix
    Citrix
  • CompTIA
    CompTIA
  • VMware
    VMware
  • ISC
    ISC
  • SAP
    SAP
  • EMC
    EMC
  • PMI
    PMI
  • HP
    HP
  • Salesforce
    Salesforce
  1. Home
  2. PECB Certification
  3. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam
  4. PECB.ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer.v2025-06-12.q165 Dumps
  • ««
  • «
  • …
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • …
  • »
  • »»
Download Now

Question 76

An organization documented each security control that it Implemented by describing their functions in detail.
Is this compliant with ISO/IEC 27001?

Correct Answer: C
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 7.5, an organization is required to maintain documented information to support the operation of its processes and to have confidence that the processes are being carried out as planned. This includes documenting the information security policy, the scope of the ISMS, the risk assessment and treatment methodology, the statement of applicability, the risk treatment plan, the information security objectives, and the results of monitoring, measurement, analysis, evaluation, internal audit, and management review. However, the standard does not specify the level of detail or the format of the documented information, as long as it is suitable for the organization's needs and context. Therefore, documenting each security control that is implemented by describing their functions in detail is not a violation of the standard, but it may not be the most efficient or effective way to document the ISMS. Documenting each security control separately may make it harder to review, update, and communicate the documented information, and may also create unnecessary duplication or inconsistency. A better approach would be to document the processes and activities that involve the use of security controls, and to reference the relevant controls from Annex A or other sources. This way, the documented information would be more aligned with the process approach and the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle that the standard promotes.
References:
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection - Information security management systems - Requirements, clauses 4.3, 5.2, 6.1, 6.2, 7.5, 8.2, 8.3, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, and Annex A
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Implementer objectives and content, 4 and 5
insert code

Question 77

Scenario 8: SunDee is a biopharmaceutical firm headquartered in California, US. Renowned for its pioneering work in the field of human therapeutics, SunDee places a strong emphasis on addressing critical healthcare concerns, particularly in the domains of cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. SunDee has demonstrated its commitment to data security and integrity by maintaining an effective information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 for the past two years.
In preparation for the recertification audit, SunDee conducted an internal audit. The company's top management appointed Alex, who has actively managed the Compliance Department's day-to-day operations for the last six months, as the internal auditor. With this dual role assignment, Alex is tasked with conducting an audit that ensures compliance and provides valuable recommendations to improve operational efficiency.
During the internal audit, a few nonconformities were identified. To address them comprehensively, the company created action plans for each nonconformity, working closely with the audit team leader.
SunDee's senior management conducted a comprehensive review of the ISMS to evaluate its appropriateness, sufficiency, and efficiency. This was integrated into their regular management meetings. Essential documents, including audit reports, action plans, and review outcomes, were distributed to all members before the meeting. The agenda covered the status of previous review actions, changes affecting the ISMS, feedback, stakeholder inputs, and opportunities for improvement. Decisions and actions targeting ISMS improvements were made, with a significant role played by the ISMS coordinator and the internal audit team in preparing follow-up action plans, which were then approved by top management.
In response to the review outcomes, SunDee promptly implemented corrective actions, strengthening its information security measures. Additionally, dashboard tools were introduced to provide a high-level overview of key performance indicators essential for monitoring the organization's information security management. These indicators included metrics on security incidents, their costs, system vulnerability tests, nonconformity detection, and resolution times, facilitating effective recording, reporting, and tracking of monitoring activities. Furthermore, SunDee embarked on a comprehensive measurement process to assess the progress and outcomes of ongoing projects, implementing extensive measures across all processes. The top management determined that the individual responsible for the information, aside from owning the data that contributes to the measures, would also be designated accountable for executing these measurement activities.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Is Alex suitable for the position of internal auditor within the company?

Correct Answer: B
insert code

Question 78

Scenario 8: SunDee is an American biopharmaceutical company, headquartered in California, the US. It specializes in developing novel human therapeutics, with a focus on cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. The company has had an information security management system (ISMS) based on SO/IEC 27001 in place for the past two years. However, it has not monitored or measured the performance and effectiveness of its ISMS and conducted management reviews regularly Just before the recertification audit, the company decided to conduct an internal audit. It also asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years for their departments. This left the Production Department with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.
Tessa was SunDee's internal auditor. With multiple reports written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever Tessa concluded that SunDee must evaluate the performance of the ISMS adequately. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations. Additionally, Tessa created a new plan which would enable SunDee to resolve these issues and presented it to the top management Based on scenario 8. does SunDee comply with ISO/IEC 27001 requirements regarding the monitoring and measurement process?

Correct Answer: C
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 9.1, the organization shall determine:
what needs to be monitored and measured, including information security processes and controls, as well as information security performance and the effectiveness of the ISMS; the methods for monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation, to ensure valid and reliable results; when the monitoring and measurement shall be performed; who shall monitor and measure; who shall analyze and evaluate the monitoring and measurement results; and how the results shall be communicated and used for decision making and improvement.
The organization shall retain documented information as evidence of the monitoring and measurement results.
The standard does not prescribe a specific frequency or method for monitoring and measurement, but it requires the organization to have a defined and documented process that is appropriate to its context, objectives, risks, and opportunities. The organization should also ensure that the monitoring and measurement results are analyzed and evaluated to determine the performance and effectiveness of the ISMS, and to identify any nonconformities, gaps, or improvement opportunities.
In the scenario, SunDee did not comply with these requirements, as it did not have a monitoring and measurement process in place, and did not monitor or measure the performance and effectiveness of its ISMS regularly. It also did not use valid and reliable methods, or communicate and use the results for improvement. Therefore, SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation was a major nonconformity, as Tessa correctly identified.
insert code

Question 79

Which tool is used to identify, analyze, and manage interested parties?

Correct Answer: B
The power/interest matrix is a tool that can be used to identify, analyze, and manage interested parties according to ISO/IEC 27001:2022. The power/interest matrix is a two-dimensional diagram that plots the level of power and interest of each interested party in relation to the organization's information security objectives.
The power/interest matrix can help the organization to prioritize the interested parties, understand their expectations and needs, and develop appropriate communication and engagement strategies. The power/interest matrix can also help the organization to identify potential risks and opportunities related to the interested parties.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 4.2; PECB ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Course, Module 4, slide 12.
insert code

Question 80

Scenario 4: TradeB. a commercial bank that has just entered the market, accepts deposits from its clients and offers basic financial services and loans for investments. TradeB has decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 Having no experience of a management [^system implementation, TradeB's top management contracted two experts to direct and manage the ISMS implementation project.
First, the project team analyzed the 93 controls of ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A and listed only the security controls deemed applicable to the company and their objectives Based on this analysis, they drafted the Statement of Applicability. Afterward, they conducted a risk assessment, during which they identified assets, such as hardware, software, and networks, as well as threats and vulnerabilities, assessed potential consequences and likelihood, and determined the level of risks based on three nonnumerical categories (low, medium, and high). They evaluated the risks based on the risk evaluation criteria and decided to treat only the high risk category They also decided to focus primarily on the unauthorized use of administrator rights and system interruptions due to several hardware failures by establishing a new version of the access control policy, implementing controls to manage and control user access, and implementing a control for ICT readiness for business continuity Lastly, they drafted a risk assessment report, in which they wrote that if after the implementation of these security controls the level of risk is below the acceptable level, the risks will be accepted What should TradeB do in order to deal with residual risks? Refer to scenario 4.

Correct Answer: A
According to ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer, residual risk is the risk remaining after risk treatment. Residual risk should be compared with the acceptable level of risk, which is the level of risk that the organization is willing to tolerate. If the residual risk is below the acceptable level of risk, then the risk can be accepted. If the residual risk is above the acceptable level of risk, then additional risk treatment options should be considered. Therefore, TradeB should evaluate, calculate, and document the value of risk reduction following risk treatment, which is the difference between the initial risk and the residual risk. This will help TradeB to determine whether the risk treatment was effective and whether the residual risk is acceptable or not.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer Study guide and documents, section 8.3.2 Risk treatment ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer Info Kit, page 14, Risk management process
insert code
  • ««
  • «
  • …
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • …
  • »
  • »»
[×]

Download PDF File

Enter your email address to download PECB.ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer.v2025-06-12.q165 Dumps

Email:

FreeQAs

Our website provides the Largest and the most Latest vendors Certification Exam materials around the world.

Using dumps we provide to Pass the Exam, we has the Valid Dumps with passing guranteed just which you need.

  • DMCA
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
©2026 FreeQAs

www.freeqas.com materials do not contain actual questions and answers from Cisco's certification exams.