FreeQAs
 Request Exam  Contact
  • Home
  • View All Exams
  • New QA's
  • Upload
PRACTICE EXAMS:
  • Oracle
  • Fortinet
  • Juniper
  • Microsoft
  • Cisco
  • Citrix
  • CompTIA
  • VMware
  • ISC
  • SAP
  • EMC
  • PMI
  • HP
  • Salesforce
  • Other
  • Oracle
    Oracle
  • Fortinet
    Fortinet
  • Juniper
    Juniper
  • Microsoft
    Microsoft
  • Cisco
    Cisco
  • Citrix
    Citrix
  • CompTIA
    CompTIA
  • VMware
    VMware
  • ISC
    ISC
  • SAP
    SAP
  • EMC
    EMC
  • PMI
    PMI
  • HP
    HP
  • Salesforce
    Salesforce
  1. Home
  2. PECB Certification
  3. ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam
  4. PECB.ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer.v2026-04-29.q297 Dumps
  • ««
  • «
  • …
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • …
  • »
  • »»
Download Now

Question 196

It is allowed that employees and contractors are provided with an anonymous reporting channel to report violations of information security policies or procedures ("whistle blowing")

Correct Answer: A
insert code

Question 197

NetworkFuse should_________________to ensure that employees are prepared for the audit. Refer to scenario
10.

Correct Answer: B
insert code

Question 198

Scenario 10: CircuitLinking is a company specializing in water purification solutions, designing and manufacturing efficient filtration and treatment systems for both residential and commercial applications. Over the past two years, the company has actively implemented an integrated management system (IMS) that aligns with both ISO/IEC 27001 for information security and ISO 9001 for quality management. Recently, the company has taken a significant step forward by applying for a combined audit, aiming to achieve certification against both ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001.
In preparation for the certification audit, CircuitLinking ensured a clear understanding of ISO/IEC 27001 within the company and identified key subject-matter experts to assist the auditors. It also allocated sufficient resources and performed a self-assessment to verify that processes were clearly defined, roles and responsibilities were segregated, and documented information was maintained. To avoid delays, the company gathered all necessary documentation in advance to provide evidence that procedures were in place and effective.
Following the successful completion of the Stage 1 audit, which focused on verifying the design of the management system, the Stage 2 audit was conducted to examine the implementation and effectiveness of the information security and quality management systems.
One of the auditors, Megan, was a previous employee of the company. To uphold the integrity of the certification process, the company notified the certification body about the potential conflict of interest and requested an auditor change. Subsequently, the certification body selected a replacement, ensuring impartiality. Additionally, the company requested a background check of the audit team members; however, the certification body denied this request. The necessary adjustments to the audit plan were made, and transparent communication with stakeholders was maintained.
The audit process continued seamlessly under the new auditor's guidance. Upon audit completion, the certification body evaluated the results and conclusions of the audit and CircuitLinking's public information and awarded CircuitLinking the combined certification.
A recertification audit for CircuitLinking was conducted to verify that the company's management system continued to meet the required standards and remained effective within the defined scope of certification. CircuitLinking had implemented significant changes to its management system, including a major overhaul of its information security processes, the adoption of new technology platforms, and adjustments to comply with recent changes in industry legislation. Due to these substantial updates, the recertification audit required a Stage 1 assessment to evaluate the impact of these changes.
According to Scenario 10, is the request made by CircuitLinking to replace Megan acceptable?

Correct Answer: C
insert code

Question 199

Scenario 9: CoreBit Systems
CoreBit Systems, with its headquarters m San Francisco, specializes in information and communication technology (ICT) solutions, its clientele primarily includes data communication enterprises and network operators. The company's core objective is to enable its clients a smooth transition into multi-service providers, aligning their operations with the complex demands of the digital landscape.
Recently. John, the internal auditor of CoreBit Systems, conducted an internal audit which uncovered nonconformities related to their monitoring procedures and system vulnerabilities, in response to the identified nonconformities. CoreBit Systems decided to employ a comprehensive problem-solving approach to solve these issues systematically. The method encompasses a team-oriented approach, aiming to identify, correct, and eliminate the root causes of issues. This approach involves several steps. First, establish a group of experts with deep knowledge of processes and controls. Next, break down the nonconformity into measurable components and implement interim containment measures. Then, identify potential root causes and select and verify permanent corrective actions. Finally, put those actions into practice, validate them, take steps to prevent recurrence, and recognize and acknowledge the team's efforts.
Following the analysis of the root cause of the nonconformities, CoreBit Systems's ISMS project manager.
Julia, developed a list of potential actions to address the identified nonconformities. Julia carefully evaluated the list to ensure that each action would effectively eliminate the root cause of the respective nonconformity.
While assessing potential corrective action for addressing a nonconformity, Julia identified the issue as significant and assessed a high likelihood of its reoccurrence Consequently, she chose to implement temporary corrective actions. Afterward. Julia combined all the nonconformities Into a single action plan and sought approval from the top management.
The submitted action plan was written as follows:
A new version of the access control policy will be established and new restrictions will be created to ensure that network access is effectively managed and monitored by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department.
However. Julia's submitted action plan was not approved by top management The reason cited was that a general action plan meant to address all nonconformities was deemed unacceptable. Consequently, Julia revised the action plan and submitted separate ones for approval Unfortunately, Julia did not adhere to the organization's specified deadline for submission, resulting in a delay in the corrective action process, and notably, the revised action plans lacked a defined schedule for execution.
Question:
Which method did CoreBit Systems use to address and prevent reoccurring problems after identifying the nonconformities?

Correct Answer: A
The described process matches the 8D (Eight Disciplines) method, commonly used for quality and compliance management. The method includes:
Forming a team
Describing the problem
Implementing containment
Identifying root causes
Choosing corrective actions
Implementing actions
Preventing recurrence
Recognizing contributions
This aligns exactly with CoreBit's approach.
References:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Clause 10.1 and 10.2 - Nonconformity and corrective action ISMS Toolkit - Incident & Nonconformity Handling (8D Reference)===========
insert code

Question 200

Scenario 3: Auto Tsaab, a Swedish Car manufacturer founded in and headquartered in Sweden, iS well-known for its innovation in the automotive industry, Despite this Strong reputation, the company has faced considerable challenges managing its documented information.
Although manual methods of handling this information may have been sufficient in the past, they now pose substantial challenges. particularly in efficiency, accuracy, and scalability. Moreover, entrusting the responsibility Of managing documented information to a single individual creates a critical vulnerability, introducing a potential single point Of failure within the organization's information management system, To address these challenges and reinforce its commitment to protecting information assets, Auto Tsaab implemented an information security management system ISMS aligned with ISO/IEC 27001. This move was critical 10 ensuring the security, confidentiality, and integrity of the companys information, particularly as it transitioned from manual to automated information management methods.
initially, Auto Tsaab established automated checking Systems that detect and Correct corruption. By implementing these automated checks, Auto Tsaab not only improved its ability to maintain data accuracy and consistency but also significantly reduced the risk of undetected errors.
Central to Auto ISMS ate documented processes. By documenting essential aspects and processes Such as the ISMS scope, information security policy, operational planning and control, information security risk assessment, internal audit. and management review. Auto Tsaab ensured that these documents were readily available and adequately protected. Moreover. Auto Tsaab utilizes a comprehensive framework incorporating 36 distinct categories spanning products, services. hardware, and software. This framework. organized in a two-dimensional matrix with six rows and six columns, facilitates the specification of technical details for components and assemblies in its small automobiles. underscoring the company's commitment to innovation and quality, TO maintain the industry standards. Auto Tsaab follows rigorous protocols in personnel selection. guaranteeing that every team member is not only eligible but also well-suited for their respective roles within the organization. Additionally, the company established formal procedures for handling policy violations and appointed an internal consultant to continuously enhance its documentation and security practices.
After committing to ISO/IEC 27001 adherence, was the documented information in Auto Tsaab's information security management system managed in compliance with the standard?

Correct Answer: B
insert code
  • ««
  • «
  • …
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • …
  • »
  • »»
[×]

Download PDF File

Enter your email address to download PECB.ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer.v2026-04-29.q297 Dumps

Email:

FreeQAs

Our website provides the Largest and the most Latest vendors Certification Exam materials around the world.

Using dumps we provide to Pass the Exam, we has the Valid Dumps with passing guranteed just which you need.

  • DMCA
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
©2026 FreeQAs

www.freeqas.com materials do not contain actual questions and answers from Cisco's certification exams.