Free SAP C_DBADM_2601 Exam Dumps Questions & Answers

CHALLENGE 1 - First Close Configuration Traceability
During first close rehearsal, claims analytics reports load successfully from the upgraded SAP HANA system. The final administration record does not show whether the post-upgrade configuration adjustment was active during the rehearsal. What should the administrator do before accepting the close reporting evidence?

• A.  Accept the evidence because successful report loading confirms close readiness.
• B.  Apply the SAP HANA Cloud setting to the upgraded system to standardize the landscape.
• C.  Remove the configuration adjustment from the review because reports loaded successfully.
• D.  Reconcile the active configuration state with the final administration record before sign-off.

CHALLENGE 1 - Recovery Review Configuration Traceability
During recovery readiness review, scheduling test users can open appointment backlog reports from both SAP HANA systems. The newly installed validation database has its active configuration documented, but the upgraded reporting system has one post-upgrade value recorded only in a maintenance handover log. What should the administrator do before accepting the readiness comparison?

• A.  Remove the documented value from the validation database record so both systems appear aligned.
• B.  Continue the review and check the handover log only if users report inconsistent results.
• C.  Reconcile the handover-log value into the upgraded system's current administration record.
• D.  Accept the comparison because both systems return the required reports during review.

A regional facilities management company runs SAP HANA for service request analytics. After a planned restart, SAP HANA cockpit shows the database as available, but a scheduled administrative validation script fails because it references a configuration profile that was renamed during the maintenance window. Manual checks from the cockpit succeed, so the service coordinator wants to close the restart activity.
The constraint is that the administrator must prove scheduled administration will execute correctly after the restart. The validation must address the renamed configuration reference rather than relying only on manual tool access.
What should the administrator do before closing the restart activity?

• A.  Reboot the database again so the scheduled script can rediscover the renamed configuration profile automatically.
• B.  Replace the scheduled script with manual cockpit checks until the next maintenance window.
• C.  Close the restart activity because manual SAP HANA cockpit checks show that the database is available.
• D.  Update and verify the scheduled validation reference to the renamed configuration profile, then rerun the administrative script.

A regional healthcare supply wholesaler runs SAP HANA for distribution analytics. SAP HANA cockpit shows the database as available, but the operations dashboard displays normal response time while a workload review shows a short queue increase during invoice analytics processing. Users reported a delay during the same interval. The support lead suggests increasing response-time thresholds because the dashboard did not show a severe issue.
The constraint is that the administrator must explain the delay using consistent monitoring evidence before changing thresholds. The next invoice analytics cycle must remain observable without masking the symptom.
Which action best supports correct troubleshooting?

• A.  Increase response-time thresholds so minor delays no longer appear as operational concerns.
• B.  Compare the dashboard interval with workload queue evidence, validate the timing relationship, and investigate the queue source before changing thresholds.
• C.  Ignore the workload queue increase because the operations dashboard showed normal response time.
• D.  Restart SAP HANA before the next invoice analytics cycle to reset both response-time and queue measurements.

A retail planning team is preparing to shift one reporting workload from an on-premises SAP HANA database to SAP HANA Cloud, while keeping transactional processing on-premises for the current phase. The technical migration path is considered feasible, but the administration team is concerned that daily operational checks, backup assumptions, and monitoring responsibilities may be split incorrectly across the two environments if the transition is rushed.
Management wants a first step that supports phased modernization without forcing an immediate redesign of the full landscape. The decision must reduce transition risk and preserve clear operational ownership across the mixed environment.
Which approach is best for this phase?

• A.  Delay the reporting move until both transactional and reporting workloads can be migrated together in one cutover.
• B.  Move the reporting workload in phases and define environment-specific operational checks and responsibilities before productive use in the target landscape.
• C.  Move the reporting workload now, but continue using the same undifferentiated operational runbook for both environments until stabilization is complete.
• D.  Keep all workloads on-premises and focus only on increasing monitoring frequency to reduce modernization risk.