Free SAP C_S4TM_2601 Exam Dumps Questions & Answers

CHALLENGE 1 - Terminal Handover Attributes in Freight Unit Preparation
During SIT, an intermodal repair-module delivery appears in depot release monitoring with the correct service hub destination and packaging details. When it reaches transportation planning, the freight unit does not carry the terminal handover point used for intermodal route planning.
What should be validated first?
Response:

• A.  Whether finance can manually add terminal handling charges after the settlement run is completed.
• B.  Whether depot teams can stage the module before the freight unit carries terminal handover data.
• C.  Whether intermodal shipments should be excluded until all direct road shipments have completed settlement.
• D.  Whether the delivery creates a transportation-relevant freight unit carrying terminal handover, packaging, and handling attributes.

CHALLENGE 2 - Service Expectation Preservation in Freight Orders
Two freight orders are created for controlled-temperature deliveries. One preserves delivery-window and handling expectations from freight unit preparation, while the manually adjusted one requires customer service to recheck the promised delivery date.
Which factor should drive the next validation?
Response:

• A.  Whether customer service can keep a spreadsheet of manual delivery-date confirmations.
• B.  Whether both freight orders can later receive any calculated carrier charge.
• C.  Whether event tracking can be skipped when the carrier already accepted the shipment.
• D.  Whether freight unit attributes remain connected to freight order grouping and carrier release preparation.

A wholesale building materials company is validating freight charge calculation in SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management before enabling settlement for additional depots. Freight orders calculate base freight correctly, but fuel surcharge amounts are missing for shipments that use a newly negotiated carrier agreement. The procurement team confirms that the carrier agreement is active, and logistics confirms that the freight orders use the intended carrier.
Finance wants to continue settlement testing for validated depots, but the affected depot must not produce incomplete carrier cost values. The constraint is to isolate the issue without delaying settlement validation for routes that already calculate charges correctly.
Which action best fits the validation constraint?
Response:

• A.  Continue settlement testing for all depots and manually add missing fuel surcharge values during finance review.
• B.  Stop all freight settlement validation until every carrier agreement across the mixed landscape has passed surcharge testing.
• C.  Validate the charge calculation setup for the newly negotiated carrier agreement and restrict release of affected depot settlements until surcharge calculation is correct.
• D.  Replace the carrier agreement for the affected depot with an older agreement that already calculates fuel surcharge values.

A packaging materials supplier is preparing freight settlement in SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management after a new carrier rate agreement was introduced for two outbound lanes. Freight orders calculate base charges correctly, but a negotiated weekend pickup surcharge appears only on one lane during settlement simulation. Both lanes use the same carrier, and logistics confirms that freight order execution is valid.
Finance wants to proceed with settlement testing for lanes that calculate correctly, but the affected lane must not create incomplete cost postings. The constraint is to validate the intended agreement-based charge behavior without redesigning the transportation network or stopping unrelated settlement tests.
Which action best fits the settlement validation objective?
Response:

• A.  Validate the charge calculation setup for the affected lane and agreement condition before releasing settlement postings dependent on the surcharge.
• B.  Stop settlement testing for all carrier lanes until every surcharge condition has been confirmed across the full landscape.
• C.  Continue settlement simulation for the affected lane and add the missing weekend surcharge manually during finance review.
• D.  Replace the new carrier agreement with the prior agreement so both lanes use charge behavior that was already validated.

A regional exhibition lighting supplier uses SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management to plan outbound shipments for venue lighting rigs and routine warehouse replenishment. Automatic planning reduces freight order count, and subcontracting to the contracted carrier works correctly. However, lighting rigs are consolidated with replenishment freight that has later delivery flexibility, causing several rigs to miss venue setup slots.
The project delivery team wants setup slots protected, while logistics wants to retain consolidation savings for routine replenishment. The constraint is to keep automatic planning and carrier subcontracting active while ensuring venue setup timing is respected before freight orders are released.
Which planning decision best supports the constraint?
Response:

• A.  Exclude all venue lighting rig shipments from automatic planning so project delivery users can manage timing manually.
• B.  Increase consolidation weighting so the planning run continues reducing freight order count across setup and replenishment freight.
• C.  Keep the current planning setup and ask the project delivery team to negotiate wider setup slots after planning.
• D.  Adjust planning criteria so venue setup slots restrict consolidation before freight orders are finalized.