A company is struggling with organizing and managing the immense amount of data generated by the business. They have been told about several possible solutions that SAP BTP offers; however, they are confused about which solutions they should use. A large amount of their historical and current data is in comma-separated values (CSV) and JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) documents. These documents need to be stored for reporting purposes. The client prefers to use the latest SAP solutions.
Which SAP BTP solution would you recommend?
A fit-to-standard analysis determined that the provided SAP Fiori App for SAP S/4HANA Cloud private edition was insufficient based on existing business requirements, and that a new front-end app must be built.
As a solution architect, you are asked to propose a solution and are told the following:
* The backend logic running on SAP S/4HANA Cloud private edition is sufficient and an appropriate remote API for create, read, update, and delete (CRUD) operations exists.
* The front-end app must be able to run on a variety of devices such as mobile phones and tablets.
* Front-end app instances must scale up or down automatically based on administrator- provided scaling parameters.
Which of the following runtimes would be optimal for the new front-end app? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.
What are some activities in the "Assess your integration strategy" phase of the SAP Integration Solution Advisory Methodology? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.
The DevOps / Site Reliability Team has a question for you. Over the course of the last month, several trust certificates have expired for several SAP BTP destinations, which has in turn occupied a significant portion of their time reinstalling. They wish to be informed before the certificate expires and to have a workflow triggered automatically.
As a solution architect, which SAP BTP service would you recommend (see attached diagram >)?
You are a solution architect on a brownfield project where an SAP ECC 6.0 system is being migrated to SAP S/4HANA Cloud public edition. Two mission- critical legacy applications must be migrated to the new system. There is some debate on the project team as to the appropriate programming model to use:
* Application 1 was originally written using classic ABAP. The underlying SAP tables that the application originally relied on have been removed and the data now exists in a new simplified table in SAP S/4HANA Cloud public edition (to which table extensions are not permitted). Additional data needed for the application resides in SAP Arib a. Remote interfaces exist for both to select the data.
* Application 2 was originally written using Java and relied upon tables from the SAP ECC 6.0 system as well as SAP PLM 4.0. The PLM system will be retired; however, the SAP S/4HANA Cloud public edition instance has all the data needed for the application. No remote interfaces exist to select the data.
Which of the following approaches should the customer use? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.
