Free Salesforce Arch-303 Exam Dumps Questions & Answers

During the testing of the login form, QA finds out that the first time the user can log in, but every other login attempt from another computer leads to the homepage and the basket being emptied. Developers tried to debug the issue, but when they add a breakpoint to the login action, it is not hit by the debugger.
Whatshould the Architect recommend developers to check?

• A.  Check Login Form and any includedtemplates for includes that enable page caching.
• B.  Add disable cache page in the template ISML - <iscache status--off''/>.
• C.  Remove CSRF protection from Login Form Action.
• D.  Add remote include for the login page

During code review, the Architect found that there is a service call on every visit of the product detail woe (PDP).
What best practices should the Architect ensure are followed for the service configuration?
Choose 2 answers

• A.  Service logging is disabled.
• B.  Circuit breaker is enabled.
• C.  Service timeout is set.
• D.  Service mock up call is configured.

The Client wants to have a flashsate on a few products every day. These products are sold through B2C Commerce as well as an in store Point of Sale system that it tied to the same inventory.
An Architect analyzes the following proposed solution:
Inventory feed w*l continue to run dailybut add a web-service call to compare and update B2C Commerce inventory in real time during checkout after a flash product's inventory reaches a threshold.
Which two risks should the Architect communicate to the Client about this solution?
Choose 2 answers

• A.  If the externals hosted web-service is unreliable. It could be a point of failure in the site s order placement flow.
• B.  If the product Inventory threshold that triggers the web service calls is reached too often. It will have a negative Impact on site performance.
• C.  Because the job would still be configured to run daily there will be a degrade in performance during non-flash sales periods
• D.  The default rate limiter configuration for the web-service could cause the web-service to return an exception during high traffic.

A third party survey provider offers both an API endpoint for individual survey data and an SFTP server endpoint that can accept batch survey data. The initial implementation of the integration includes
1.Marking the order as requiring a survey before order placement
2. On the order confirmation pace, the survey form is displayed for the customer to fill
3. The data is sent to the survey provider API, and the order it marked as not requiring a survey Later it was identified that this solution is not fit for purpose as the following issues and additional requirements were identified:
1. If the API call fails, the corresponding survey data is lost. The Business requires to avoid data loss.
2. Some customers skipped the form. The Business require sending a survey email to such customers.
3. The Order Management System (OMS) uses a non-standard XML parser it did not manage to parse orders with the survey, until the survey attribute was manually removedfrom the xml.
How should the Architect address the issues and requirements described above?

• A.  Create a custom object when the survey is required Send to the API endpoint in real-time. On success, remove the object. Onfailure, capture the survey data in the custom object and later reprocess with a job. Use the custom object to send emails for the cases when survey was skipped.
• B.  Create a custom session attribute when the survey is required. Send to the API endpoint in real-time. On failure, capture the survey data in the session and reprocess, use me session attribute to send emails for the cases when survey was skipped.
• C.  Send the survey data to the API endpoint in real-time until the survey data is successfullycaptured.Instruct the OMS development team to update their XML parser, use the Order survey attribute to send emails for the cases when the survey was skipped.
• D.  Create a custom object to store the survey data. Send to the API endpoint using a job. On success, remove the custom object. On failure, send the survey data with APIfrom the next execution of the same job. Use the custom object to send emails for the cases when the survey was skipped.

An Order Management System (OMS) handles orders from multiple brandspecific sites, as part of the processing, the OMS sends the processing detail to be added at notes to the orders in B2C Commerce. These processing details are captured temporarily in custom objects, and are later processed by a batch Job that:
* Processes the custom object to extract the orderid and note data.
* Tries to load the order.
* If the order is not found, it deletes the custom object and moves on.
* If the order is found, it updates notes In the Order, upon successful update of this order, it deletes the custom object.
There is an Issue reported that the job is constantly failing and custom objects are growing in number. On investigating the production look the message below is being logged on each failure:

What are three solution The Architect can take to fix this issue without losing meaningful data?
Choose 3 answers

• A.  Take the backup of the custom object and delete the custom object to ensure on the next job run the custom objects are getting processed.
• B.  Take the backup of the Order as XML and delete the notes from Order to ensure on the next jobrun the custom objects are getting processed.
• C.  Using BM site import/export, softenthe<quota id=''object.orderPo.relation,notes''> <custom- action>warn<custom-action> </quots>to make sure that neither order notes are lost and custom object is processed.
• D.  Engage B2C Commerce Support Team to soften the quota limit for ''object.OrderPO.relation.notes''
• E.  Take the backup of the Order as XML and delete the Order to ensure on the next job run, the custom objects are getting processed.