FreeQAs
 Request Exam  Contact
  • Home
  • View All Exams
  • New QA's
  • Upload
PRACTICE EXAMS:
  • Oracle
  • Fortinet
  • Juniper
  • Microsoft
  • Cisco
  • Citrix
  • CompTIA
  • VMware
  • ISC
  • SAP
  • EMC
  • PMI
  • HP
  • Salesforce
  • Other
  • Oracle
    Oracle
  • Fortinet
    Fortinet
  • Juniper
    Juniper
  • Microsoft
    Microsoft
  • Cisco
    Cisco
  • Citrix
    Citrix
  • CompTIA
    CompTIA
  • VMware
    VMware
  • ISC
    ISC
  • SAP
    SAP
  • EMC
    EMC
  • PMI
    PMI
  • HP
    HP
  • Salesforce
    Salesforce
  1. Home
  2. Salesforce Certification
  3. Integration-Architect Exam
  4. Salesforce.Integration-Architect.v2026-04-10.q107 Dumps
  • ««
  • «
  • …
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • …
  • »
  • »»
Download Now

Question 56

An organization needs to integrate Salesforce with an external system and is considering authentication options. The organization already has implemented SAML, using athird-party Identity Provider for integrations between other systems.
Which use case can leverage the existing SAML integration to connect Salesforce with other internal systems?

Correct Answer: B
The best use case for leveraging the existing SAML integration to connect Salesforce with other internal systems is to make Apex SOAP outbound integrations to external web servicesmore secure. SAML can be used to authenticate the Salesforce org as the service provider and obtain a session ID from the external system as the identity provider. This session ID can then be used to make SOAP calls to the external web service without exposing any credentials in the Apex code. Option A is not correct because formula fields with HYPERLINK() do not support SAML authentication. Option C is not correct because Apex REST outbound integrations require OAuth or basic authentication, not SAML. Option D is not correct because API inbound integrations from an external Java client require OAuth or basic authentication, not SAML.
References:
Named Credentials as Callout Endpoints
SAML SSO with Salesforce as the Service Provider
insert code

Question 57

A large enterprise customer with the following system landscape is planning to implement Salesforce Sales Cloud.

The following business processes need to be supported in Salesforce:
1. Sales Consultants should be able to have access to current inventory.
2. Enterprise Resource Planning System(ERP) is the system of record for pricing information.
3. Quotes should be generated in Salesforce with pricing from ERP.
4. Sales Management uses a Enterprise Business Intelligence (BI) tool to view Sales dashboards.
5. Master Data Management (MDM) is the system of record for customers and prospects.
6. Invoices should be accessible in Salesforce.
Which systems in the landscape should the Integration Consultant consider to be integrated with Salesforce to support the business requirements?

Correct Answer: C
insert code

Question 58

A customer imports data from an external system into Salesforce using Bulk API. These jobs have batch sizes of 2,000 and are run in parallel mode. The batches fail frequently with the error "Max CPU time exceeded". A smaller batch size will fix this error. What should be considered when using a smaller batch size?

Correct Answer: A
The Bulk API is designed to process massive datasets by breaking them into smaller batches that Salesforce processes asynchronously. When a batch fails with the "Max CPU time exceeded" error, it typically indicates that the complexity of the operations triggered by the record-such as Apex triggers, Flows, or complex sharing calculations-exceeds the 10,000ms limit within a single transaction.
Reducing the batch size is the standard architectural remedy because it reduces the number of records processed in a single transaction, thereby lowering the total CPU time consumed by those records. However, the architect must consider the impact on the overall throughput and execution time.
When batch sizes are smaller, the total number of batches required to process the same dataset increases. For instance, moving from a batch size of 2,000 to 200 for a 1-million-record dataset increases the number of batches from 500 to 5,000. Each batch carries its own overhead for initialization and finalization within the Salesforce platform. Consequently, while the individual batches are more likely to succeed, the total time required to complete the entire job will increase.
The architect should also be aware of the daily limit on the total number of batches allowed (typically 15,000 in a 24-hour period). While Option C mentions API request limits, the Bulk API is governed more strictly by its own batch limits. Option B is less likely because "parallel mode" naturally manages concurrency. Thus, the primary trade-off the architect must present to the business is a gain in reliability (successful processing) at the cost of total duration (increased sync time).
insert code

Question 59

Which WSDL should an architect consider when creating an integration that might be used for more than one salesforce organization and different met

Correct Answer: B
Explanation
The Partner WSDL is the best option for creating an integration that might be used for more than one Salesforce organization and different metadata. The Partner WSDL is loosely typed and can reflect against any configuration of Salesforce. It is static and does not change if modifications are made to an organization's Salesforce configuration. Therefore, it is more flexible and adaptable than the Enterprise WSDL, which is strongly typed and bound to a specific configuration of Salesforce1 References: Differences between Salesforce provided WSDL files
insert code

Question 60

A company accepts payment requests 24/7. Once the company accepts a payment request, its service level agreement (SLA) r5equires it to make sure each payment request is processed by its Payment System. The co6mpany tracks payment requests using a globally unique identifier created at the Data Entry Point. The company's simplified flow is as shown in the diagram.

The company encounters intermittent update errors when two or more processes try to update the same Payment Request record at the same time.
Which recommendation should an integration architect make to improve the company's SLA and update conflict handling?

Correct Answer: C
To fulfill the SLA of ensuring every payment is processed while simultaneously resolving the issue of intermittent update errors, the architect must introduce an orchestration layer capable of managing state and concurrency. In a high-volume payment environment, "Fire and Forget" messages (as seen in the provided diagram) can lead to race conditions if multiple threads attempt to update a single record simultaneously-a common challenge when scaling payment systems.
The recommendation to have Middleware coordinate request delivery and payment processing (Option C) transforms the architecture into a managed queueing system. By coordinating delivery, the middleware can act as a traffic controller, ensuring that requests are delivered sequentially or that appropriate locks are respected before an update is attempted. This orchestration allows the system to meet its SLA by implementing a "guaranteed delivery" pattern, where the middleware tracks the status of each payment and only "forgets" the message once the Payment System confirms successful processing.
Furthermore, the architect should emphasize idempotency by leveraging the globally unique identifier created at the Data Entry Point. The Payment System should be designed to use this identifier to check if a specific transaction has already been processed before attempting an update. This prevents duplicate entries and conflicting updates, even if the middleware retries a message due to a network timeout. While retries (Options A and B) are part of a resilient system, they do not solve the root cause of record contention; only the coordination and sequencing provided by the middleware can ensure a stable, conflict-free integration flow.78
insert code
  • ««
  • «
  • …
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • …
  • »
  • »»
[×]

Download PDF File

Enter your email address to download Salesforce.Integration-Architect.v2026-04-10.q107 Dumps

Email:

FreeQAs

Our website provides the Largest and the most Latest vendors Certification Exam materials around the world.

Using dumps we provide to Pass the Exam, we has the Valid Dumps with passing guranteed just which you need.

  • DMCA
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
©2026 FreeQAs

www.freeqas.com materials do not contain actual questions and answers from Cisco's certification exams.