FreeQAs
 Request Exam  Contact
  • Home
  • View All Exams
  • New QA's
  • Upload
PRACTICE EXAMS:
  • Oracle
  • Fortinet
  • Juniper
  • Microsoft
  • Cisco
  • Citrix
  • CompTIA
  • VMware
  • ISC
  • SAP
  • EMC
  • PMI
  • HP
  • Salesforce
  • Other
  • Oracle
    Oracle
  • Fortinet
    Fortinet
  • Juniper
    Juniper
  • Microsoft
    Microsoft
  • Cisco
    Cisco
  • Citrix
    Citrix
  • CompTIA
    CompTIA
  • VMware
    VMware
  • ISC
    ISC
  • SAP
    SAP
  • EMC
    EMC
  • PMI
    PMI
  • HP
    HP
  • Salesforce
    Salesforce
  1. Home
  2. Snowflake Certification
  3. ARA-C01 Exam
  4. Snowflake.ARA-C01.v2024-12-26.q155 Dumps
  • ««
  • «
  • …
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • …
  • »
  • »»
Download Now

Question 106

By executing the 'SHOW TABLES' command, we can list all the tables in all the schemas even if we do not have access to all the tables

Correct Answer: A
insert code

Question 107

The following table exists in the production database:
A regulatory requirement states that the company must mask the username for events that are older than six months based on the current date when the data is queried.
How can the requirement be met without duplicating the event data and making sure it is applied when creating views using the table or cloning the table?

Correct Answer: C
A masking policy is a feature of Snowflake that allows masking sensitive data in query results based on the role of the user and the condition of the data. A masking policy can be applied to a column in a table or a view, and it can use another column in the same table or view as a conditional column. A conditional column is a column that determines whether the masking policy is applied or not based on its value1.
In this case, the requirement can be met by using a masking policy on the username column with event_timestamp as a conditional column. The masking policy can use a function that masks the username if the event_timestamp is older than six months based on the current date, and returns the original username otherwise. The masking policy can be applied to the user_events table, and it will also be applied when creating views using the table or cloning the table2.
The other options are not correct because:
* A. Using a masking policy on the username column using an entitlement table with valid dates would require creating another table that stores the valid dates for each username, and joining it with the user_events table in the masking policy function. This would add complexity and overhead to the masking policy, and it would not use the event_timestamp column as the condition for masking.
* B. Using a row level policy on the user_events table using an entitlement table with valid dates would require creating another table that stores the valid dates for each username, and joining it with the user_events table in the row access policy function. This would filter out the rows that have event_timestamp older than six months based on the valid dates, instead of masking the username column. This would not meet the requirement of masking the username, and it would also reduce the visibility of the event data.
* D. Using a secure view on the user_events table using a case statement on the username column would require creating a view that uses a case expression to mask the username column based on the event_timestamp column. This would meet the requirement of masking the username, but it would not be applied when cloning the table. A secure view is a view that prevents the underlying data from being exposed by queries on the view. However, a secure view does not prevent the underlying data from being exposed by cloning the table3.
References:
* 1: Masking Policies | Snowflake Documentation
* 2: Using Conditional Columns in Masking Policies | Snowflake Documentation
* 3: Secure Views | Snowflake Documentation
insert code

Question 108

While choosing a cluster key, what is recommended by snowflake?

Correct Answer: B,C
insert code

Question 109

A company's Architect needs to find an efficient way to get data from an external partner, who is also a Snowflake user. The current solution is based on daily JSON extracts that are placed on an FTP server and uploaded to Snowflake manually. The files are changed several times each month, and the ingestion process needs to be adapted to accommodate these changes.
What would be the MOST efficient solution?

Correct Answer: A
The most efficient solution is to ask the partner to create a share and add the company's account (Option A). This way, the company can access the live data from the partner without any data movement or manual intervention. Snowflake's secure data sharing feature allows data providers to share selected objects in a database with other Snowflake accounts. The shared data is read-only and does not incur any storage or compute costs for the data consumers. The data consumers can query the shared data directly or create local copies of the shared objects in their own databases. Option B is not efficient because it involves using the data lake export feature, which is intended for exporting data from Snowflake to an external data lake, not for importing data from another Snowflake account. The data lake export feature also requires the data provider to create an external stage on cloud storage and use the COPY INTO <location> command to export the data into parquet files. The data consumer then needs to create an external table or a file format to load the data from the cloud storage into Snowflake. This process can be complex and costly, especially if the data changes frequently. Option C is not efficient because it does not solve the problem of manual data ingestion and adaptation. Keeping the current structure of daily JSON extracts on an FTP server and requesting the partner to stop changing files, instead only appending new files, does not improve the efficiency or reliability of the data ingestion process. The company still needs to upload the data to Snowflake manually and deal with any schema changes or data quality issues. Option D is not efficient because it requires the partner to set up a Snowflake reader account and use that account to get the data for ingestion. A reader account is a special type of account that can only consume data from the provider account that created it. It is intended for data consumers who are not Snowflake customers and do not have a licensing agreement with Snowflake. A reader account is not suitable for data ingestion from another Snowflake account, as it does not allow uploading, modifying, or unloading data. The company would need to use external tools or interfaces to access the data from the reader account and load it into their own account, which can be slow and expensive. Reference: The answer can be verified from Snowflake's official documentation on secure data sharing, data lake export, and reader accounts available on their website. Here are some relevant links:
Introduction to Secure Data Sharing | Snowflake Documentation
Data Lake Export Public Preview Is Now Available on Snowflake | Snowflake Blog Managing Reader Accounts | Snowflake Documentation
insert code

Question 110

A media company needs a data pipeline that will ingest customer review data into a Snowflake table, and apply some transformations. The company also needs to use Amazon Comprehend to do sentiment analysis and make the de-identified final data set available publicly for advertising companies who use different cloud providers in different regions.
The data pipeline needs to run continuously and efficiently as new records arrive in the object storage leveraging event notifications. Also, the operational complexity, maintenance of the infrastructure, including platform upgrades and security, and the development effort should be minimal.
Which design will meet these requirements?

Correct Answer: B
Option B is the best design to meet the requirements because it uses Snowpipe to ingest the data continuously and efficiently as new records arrive in the object storage, leveraging event notifications. Snowpipe is a service that automates the loading of data from external sources into Snowflake tables1. It also uses streams and tasks to orchestrate transformations on the ingested data. Streams are objects that store the change history of a table, and tasks are objects that execute SQL statements on a schedule or when triggered by another task2.
Option B also uses an external function to do model inference with Amazon Comprehend and write the final records to a Snowflake table. An external function is a user-defined function that calls an external API, such as Amazon Comprehend, to perform computations that are not natively supported by Snowflake3. Finally, option B uses the Snowflake Marketplace to make the de-identified final data set available publicly for advertising companies who use different cloud providers in different regions. The Snowflake Marketplace is a platform that enables data providers to list and share their data sets with data consumers, regardless of the cloud platform or region they use4.
Option A is not the best design because it uses copy into to ingest the data, which is not as efficient and continuous as Snowpipe. Copy into is a SQL command that loads data from files into a table in a single transaction. It also exports the data into Amazon S3 to do model inference with Amazon Comprehend, which adds an extra step and increases the operational complexity and maintenance of the infrastructure.
Option C is not the best design because it uses Amazon EMR and PySpark to ingest and transform the data, which also increases the operational complexity and maintenance of the infrastructure. Amazon EMR is a cloud service that provides a managed Hadoop framework to process and analyze large-scale data sets.
PySpark is a Python API for Spark, a distributed computing framework that can run on Hadoop. Option C also develops a python program to do model inference by leveraging the Amazon Comprehend text analysis API, which increases the development effort.
Option D is not the best design because it is identical to option A, except for the ingestion method. It still exports the data into Amazon S3 to do model inference with Amazon Comprehend, which adds an extra step and increases the operational complexity and maintenance of the infrastructure.
References: 1: Snowpipe Overview 2: Using Streams and Tasks to Automate Data Pipelines 3: External Functions Overview 4: Snowflake Data Marketplace Overview : [Loading Data Using COPY INTO] : [What is Amazon EMR?] : [PySpark Overview]
insert code
  • ««
  • «
  • …
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • …
  • »
  • »»
[×]

Download PDF File

Enter your email address to download Snowflake.ARA-C01.v2024-12-26.q155 Dumps

Email:

FreeQAs

Our website provides the Largest and the most Latest vendors Certification Exam materials around the world.

Using dumps we provide to Pass the Exam, we has the Valid Dumps with passing guranteed just which you need.

  • DMCA
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
©2026 FreeQAs

www.freeqas.com materials do not contain actual questions and answers from Cisco's certification exams.