FreeQAs
 Request Exam  Contact
  • Home
  • View All Exams
  • New QA's
  • Upload
PRACTICE EXAMS:
  • Oracle
  • Fortinet
  • Juniper
  • Microsoft
  • Cisco
  • Citrix
  • CompTIA
  • VMware
  • ISC
  • SAP
  • EMC
  • PMI
  • HP
  • Salesforce
  • Other
  • Oracle
    Oracle
  • Fortinet
    Fortinet
  • Juniper
    Juniper
  • Microsoft
    Microsoft
  • Cisco
    Cisco
  • Citrix
    Citrix
  • CompTIA
    CompTIA
  • VMware
    VMware
  • ISC
    ISC
  • SAP
    SAP
  • EMC
    EMC
  • PMI
    PMI
  • HP
    HP
  • Salesforce
    Salesforce
  1. Home
  2. VMware Certification
  3. 2V0-15.25 Exam
  4. VMware.2V0-15.25.v2026-10-13.q22 Dumps
  • «
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • »
Download Now

Question 1

An administrator has successfully deployed and configured the Application Monitoring Telegraf Agent to 30 virtual machines through VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) Operations.
After 24 hours, the administrator is alerted to the fact that no additional data has been collected since the agents were deployed on the virtual machines.
What could be the possible cause of the issue?

Correct Answer: A
Application Monitoring in VCF Operations uses Telegraf agents running inside virtual machines. These agents forward metrics to theCloud Proxy, which then sends them to the Operations analytics cluster. One of the most common reasons an agent stops reporting data-especially exactly24 hoursafter deployment-is clock drift or time mismatchbetween the VM (running the Telegraf agent) and the Cloud Proxy.
VCF Operations enforcesstrict timestamp validation. If the timestamps from the agent are outside the acceptable drift window, the Cloud Proxyrejectsincoming data as invalid. In this case, the Telegraf agents appear installed and functional, but no new metrics are received by the analytics engine.
This is a well-known issue documented in VMware Aria/VCF Operations agent-based monitoring, where:
* Agents send metrics with local system time.
* Cloud Proxy enforces time validation to prevent corrupt metric ingestion.
* A drift >5 minutes commonly results inzero data collectiondespite healthy connectivity.
Options B and C cannot stop data flow after exactly 24 hours; they would preventinitialcollection. Option D (virtual hardware/tools compatibility) affects VM operations butnotTelegraf metric time-stamp validation.
insert code

Question 2

An administrator is asked to create a second provider gateway (provider gateway 02) in VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) Automation Region-A.
After launching the Create Provider Gateway workflow in the VCF Automation Provider Management Portal, no Tier-0 Gateway is available for assignment.
How would you resolve this issue?

Correct Answer: C
In VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0, aProvider Gatewayin VCF Automation is always backed by anexisting Tier-0 or Tier-0 VRF gatewayin NSX. When the administrator launches theCreate Provider Gateway workflow and no Tier-0 gateways appear for assignment, this indicates that VCF Automation cannot discover any valid Tier-0 gateways in the associated region.
The VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 documentation explicitly states thatbefore adding a Provider Gateway, an administratormust first create an Active-Standby Tier-0 Gateway in NSX Manager. The Provider Gateway workflow only lists Tier-0 gateways that already exist and are properly configured in NSX. If none are present, the list will be empty.
From the documentation:"To add a provider gateway, first you must create an Active Standby tier-0 gateway in the NSX Manager associated with the region to back it.". Provider gateways in VCF Automationare discovered from these preexisting Tier-0 gatewaysand cannot be created until they exist.
Creating a Tier-1 gateway (Option B) does not satisfy the requirement because Provider Gateways must map specifically toTier-0, not Tier-1. Retrying the workflow (Option D) will not resolve the issue because the Tier-
0 backing resource is missing. Creating a new region (Option A) is unnecessary unless required for other organizational reasons, and it still would not produce a Tier-0 gateway.
Therefore, the correct and verified solution is tolog in to NSX Manager and create the required Tier-0 gateway, after which it will appear in the Provider Gateway creation workflow.
insert code

Question 3

An administrator has created an alarm for an object in VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) Operations. The alert does not show up In the alert pane despite being configured on the object.
Parameters:
* Symptom definition: Read Latency (ms) is higher than 1 ms.
* Alert definition: Alert is triggered as soon as the latency is higher than the 1 ms defined in the symptom definition.
* Object type: Virtual Machine.
What is the reason the alert does not show up in the alert view?

Correct Answer: C
In VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0, VCF Operations (vROps-based) usespoliciesto control which alerts, symptoms, and metrics are evaluated for a given object. Creating an alert definition and symptom alone is not sufficient; the alert must beassociated with and enabled in a policythat is actively applied to the target object (in this case, a Virtual Machine). The documentation shows that when you create an alert definition, there is an explicitPolicies step, where you select the policy (for example, the default policy) so that the alert becomes active for objects governed by that policy.
The metric "Read Latency (ms)" is valid for virtual-machine-related objects: VCF Operations documents Read Latency metrics at the VM disk and VM-datastore link level (for Disk and Datastore metrics on Virtual Machines). Therefore, option B (metric not applicable) is incorrect. No requirement exists that such a performance alert must be forwarded from VCF Operations for Logs (D); log-based alerts are a separate alert type.
If the alert definition is not enabled in the effective policy for that VM, VCF Operations will not evaluate the symptom or generate the alert, and it will not appear in the alert pane-even though the definition technically exists. This matches optionCexactly.
insert code

Question 4

An administrator is troubleshooting network connectivity issues on a VMware ESX host configured with a dedicated VMware vSAN vSphere Distributed Switch (vDS) port group. The VMware vSAN vDS port group has two physical adapters and two uplinks assigned. After a failure of the active physical adapter, the vSAN vDS connection over the vSAN network was lost.
What is the cause of the issue?

Correct Answer: C
In vSAN ESA or OSA networking configured through a dedicated vSphere Distributed Switch (vDS), each vSAN vmkernel port must have at least oneActivephysical uplink available at all times. The scenario describes a vDS withtwo physical adaptersandtwo uplinks, but after failure of the active uplink,vSAN traffic was lost. This only occurs when the second physical NIC isnot actually assigned to the vSAN port group-typically because its uplink is set to"Unused".
In such a misconfiguration:
* vSAN traffic only uses the single active uplink.
* When that uplink fails, vSAN hasno failover path, causing immediate connectivity loss.
Option A (storage policies) does not affect network uplink behavior.
Option B (VLAN tagging) could cause connectivity failure but would not suddenly break only after an uplink failure.
Option D (failover policy not allowing fallback) affects recovery order, not immediate redundancy.
insert code

Question 5

An administrator is attempting to activate a new vSphere Supervisor for use with VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) Automation on a newly deployed cluster. In the VMware vSphere client, when going through the vSphere Supervisor activation having selected VCF Networking with VPC, the Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) Connectivity Profile dropdown is empty on the workload network page. The administrator verified that a Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) Connectivity Profile exists in NSX.
What is the cause of the issue?

Correct Answer: C
When activating avSphere Supervisor using VCF Networking with VPC, theSupervisor Workload Networkmust use aVPC Connectivity Profile. These profiles arescoped to an NSX Project, andcannot be consumed from the Default Project.
VCF Automation requires that:
* Acustom NSX Projectbe used for VPC networking integrations.
* TheDefault Projectcannot host Connectivity Profiles or VPC constructs intended for Supervisor activation.
Even though the administrator verified that a VPC Connectivity Profileexistsin NSX, the Supervisor wizard will not display it if:
* The VPC Connectivity Profile belongs to adifferent project, or
* The current selection is theDefault Project, which blocks visibility.
This exact behavior-empty VPC Connectivity Profile dropdown-is documented when attempting Supervisor activation under the Default NSX Project.
Option A (T0 active/active) affects North-South routing but does not hide VPC profiles.
Option B (Supervisor HA mode) does not impact network profile selection.
Option D (missing default VPC) is incorrect because the wizard is complaining aboutavailability of Connectivity Profiles, not VPC instances.
insert code
  • «
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • »
[×]

Download PDF File

Enter your email address to download VMware.2V0-15.25.v2026-10-13.q22 Dumps

Email:

FreeQAs

Our website provides the Largest and the most Latest vendors Certification Exam materials around the world.

Using dumps we provide to Pass the Exam, we has the Valid Dumps with passing guranteed just which you need.

  • DMCA
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
©2026 FreeQAs

www.freeqas.com materials do not contain actual questions and answers from Cisco's certification exams.