A virtual server for a set of web services is constructed on an LTM device. The LTM Specialist has created an iRule and applied this iRule to the virtual server:
when HTTP_REQUEST {
switch [HTTP::uri] {
"/WS1/ws.jsp" {
log local0. "[HTTP::uri]-Redirected to JSP Pool"
pool JSP
}
default { log local0. "[HTTP::uri]-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool"
pool NonJSP
}
}
}
However, the iRule is NOT behaving as expected. Below is a snapshot of the log:
/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool
/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool
/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool
/WS1/WS.jsp-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool
/ws1/WS.jsp-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool
/WS1/ws.jsp-Redirected to JSP Pool
/ws1/ws.jsp-Redirected to Non-JSP Pool
What is the problem?

• A.The pool members of both pools need to be set up as case-insensitive members.
• B.The condition in the iRule is case sensitive.
• C.The 'switch' command in the iRule has been used incorrectly.
• D.The "Process Case-Insensitivity" option for the virtual server needs to be selected.

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

-- Exhibit-

-- Exhibit --
Refer to the exhibit.
A user is unable to access an application.
What is the root cause of the problem?

• A.The 'Content-Length' is zero.
• B.The GET request uses the wrong syntax.
• C.The user failed authentication.
• D.The User-Agent is incorrect.

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

A web application requires knowledge of the client's true IP address for logging and analysis purposes. Instances of the application that can decode X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers reside in pool_a, while pool_b instances assume the source IP is the true address of the client.
Which iRule provides the proper functionality?

• A.when HTTP_REQUEST { if {[HTTP::header exists X-Forwarded-For]}{ pool pool_a } else { pool pool_b } }
• B.when HTTP_RESPONSE { if {[HTTP::header exists X-Forwarded-For]}{ pool pool_a } else { pool pool_b } }
• C.when HTTP_DATA { if {[HTTP::header exists X-Forwarded-For]}{ pool pool_a } else { pool pool_b } }
• D.when HTTP_OPEN { if {[HTTP::header exists X-Forwarded-For]}{ pool pool_a } else { pool pool_b } }

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

An LTM Specialist has just manually failed the active LTM device over to the standby LTM device. The LTM Specialist notices the newly active LTM device is NOT currently receiving traffic. The LTM Specialist verifies the newly active device is responding to ARP but still no traffic is hitting the virtual servers. The LTM Specialist also notices that the virtual servers eventually start responding.
What should be added to the configuration to resolve the problem?

• A.connection mirroring
• B.network failover
• C.floating self IP
• D.vlan failsafe
• E.MAC masquerading

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

A OneConnect profile is applied to a virtual server. The LTM Specialist would like the client source IP addresses within the 10.10.10.0/25 range to reuse an existing server side connection.
Which OneConnect profile source mask should the LTM Specialist use?

• A.255.255.255.224
• B.255.255.255.0
• C.255.255.255.255
• D.255.255.255.128
• E.0.0.0.0

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *