Refer to the exhibit.

A Mule application is being designed to be deployed to several CIoudHub workers. The Mule application's integration logic is to replicate changed Accounts from Satesforce to a backend system every 5 minutes.
A watermark will be used to only retrieve those Satesforce Accounts that have been modified since the last time the integration logic ran.
What is the most appropriate way to implement persistence for the watermark in order to support the required data replication integration logic?

• A.Persistent Cache Scope
• B.Persistent Anypoint MQ Queue
• C.Persistent VM Queue
• D.Persistent Object Store

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

49 of A popular retailer is designing a public API for its numerous business partners. Each business partner will invoke the API at the URL 58. https://api.acme.com/partnefs/vl. The API implementation is estimated to require deployment to 5 CloudHub workers.
The retailer has obtained a public X.509 certificate for the name apl.acme.com, signed by a reputable CA, to be used as the server certificate.
Where and how should the X.509 certificate and Mule applications be used to configure load balancing among the 5 CloudHub workers, and what DNS entries should be configured in order for the retailer to support its numerous business partners?

• A.Add the X.509 certificate to a CloudHub Dedicated Load Balancer (DLB), not to the Mule application Create a CNAME for api.acme.com pointing to the DLB's A record
• B.Add the X.509 certificate to the Mule application's deployable archive, then configure a CloudHub Dedicated Load Balancer (DLB) for each of the Mule application's CloudHub workers Create a CNAME for api.acme.com pointing to the DLB's A record
• C.Add the x.509 certificate to the Mule application's deployable archive, then configure the CloudHub Shared Load Balancer (SLB) for each of the Mule application's CloudHub workers Create a CNAME for api.acme.com pointing to the SLB's A record
• D.Add the X.509 certificate to the CloudHub Shared Load Balancer (SLB), not to the Mule application Create a CNAME for api.acme.com pointing to the SLB's A record

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

Mule application A receives a request Anypoint MQ message REQU with a payload containing a variable-length list of request objects. Application A uses the For Each scope to split the list into individual objects and sends each object as a message to an Anypoint MQ queue.
Service S listens on that queue, processes each message independently of all other messages, and sends a response message to a response queue.
Application A listens on that response queue and must in turn create and publish a response Anypoint MQ message RESP with a payload containing the list of responses sent by service S in the same order as the request objects originally sent in REQU.
Assume successful response messages are returned by service S for all request messages.
What is required so that application A can ensure that the length and order of the list of objects in RESP and REQU match, while at the same time maximizing message throughput?

• A.Use a Scatter-Gather within the For Each scope to ensure response message order Configure the Scatter-Gather with a persistent object store
• B.Perform all communication involving service S synchronously from within the For Each scope, so objects in RESP are in the exact same order as request objects in REQU
• C.Use an Async scope within the For Each scope and collect response messages in a second For Each scope in the order In which they arrive, then send RESP using this list of responses
• D.Keep track of the list length and all object indices in REQU, both in the For Each scope and in all communication involving service Use persistent storage when creating RESP

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

An organization is designing Mule application which connects to a legacy backend. It has been reported that backend services are not highly available and experience downtime quite often. As an integration architect which of the below approach you would propose to achieve high reliability goals?

• A.Alerts can be configured in Mule runtime so that backend team can be communicated when services are down
• B.Until Successful scope can be implemented while calling backend API's
• C.On Error Continue scope to be used to call in case of error again
• D.Create a batch job with all requests being sent to backend using that job as per the availability of backend API's

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

A Mule application name Pub uses a persistence object store. The Pub Mule application is deployed to Cloudhub and it configured to use Object Store v2.
Another Muleapplication name sub is being developed to retrieve values from the Pub Mule application persistence object Store and will also be deployed to cloudhub.
What is the most direct way for the Sub Mule application to retrieve values from the Pub Mule application persistence object store with the least latency?

• A.Use the Object store v2 REST API configured to access the Pub Mule application persistence object store.
• B.Use an Anypoint MQ connector configured to directly access the Pub Mule application persistence object store
• C.Use an object store connector configured to access the Pub Mule application persistence object store
• D.Use a VM connector configured to directly access the persistence queue of the Pub Mule application persistence object store.

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *