Which two SVMs would benefit from a load-sharing mirror? (Choose two.)

• A.An SVM that is configured for FCP.
• B.An SVM that is configured for iSCSI.
• C.An SVM that is configured for NFS.
• D.An SVM that is configured for CIFS.

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

A disaster causes a FlexGroup volume to be unrecoverable, but it was protected by a SnapMirror relationship. You solve the issue, and the source is operational. Now, you want to return to serving the data from the original source.
In this scenario, what do you do next?

• A.Initialize the SnapMirror relationship.
• B.Restore data from a backup copy.
• C.Perform a SnapMirror update.
• D.Delete the SnapMirror relationship.

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

Exhibit:



You are provided output from the sysconfig -a and sysconfig -r commands of a MetroCluster cluster for disk switch 1:15.45 SN#J9YG1U3L, as shown In the exhibit.
Which two statements are true in this scenario? (Choose two.)

• A.The disk is located in switch3.
• B.The disk is located at the file2 site.
• C.The disk is in shelf 2 bay 13.
• D.The disk is located at the file3 site.

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

You want to use the supported method to upgrade the ONTAP version of a Cloud Volumes ONTAP instance from ONTAP 9.5 to ONTAP 9.6.
In this scenario, which NetApp tool accomplishes this task?

• A.Cloud Manager
• B.Active IQ Unified Manager
• C.ONTAP System Manager
• D.Cloud Insights

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

Your customer's MetroCluster has generated a "DISK REDUNDANCY FAILED" message.
Netapp-EmA:
Tue Jan 14 04:12:12 CET [netapp-EmA:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv' failed.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:13 CET [netapp-EmA:rv.connection.torndown:info]: HA interconnect: cfo_rv1 is torn down on NIC 1.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:13 CET [netapp-EmA:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv'1 failed.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:15 CET [netapp-EmA:rv.connection.torndown:info]: HA interconnect: cfo_rv2 is torn down on NIC 1.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:18 CET [netapp-EmA:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv'2 failed.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:19 CET [netapp-EmA:bridge.removed:info]: FC-to_SAS bridge siteB_2:13.126L0 [ATTO FibreBridge6500N 1.61] S/N [FB7500N111161] was removed Tue Jan 14 04:12:19 CET [netapp-EmA:bridge.removed:info]: FC-to_SAS bridge siteB_2:5.126L0 [ATTO FibreBridge6500N 1.61] S/N [FB7500N111160] was removed Netapp-EmB:
Tue Jan 14 04:12:12 CET [netapp-EmB:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv' failed.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:12 CET [netapp-EmB:rv.connection.torndown:info]: HA interconnect: cfo_rv2 is torn down on NIC 1.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:13 CET [netapp-EmB:rv.connection.torndown:info]: HA interconnect: cfo_rv1 is torn down on NIC 1.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:13 CET [netapp-EmB:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv'1 failed.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:18 CET [netapp-EmB:cf.rv.notConnected:error]: HA interconnect: Connection for 'cfo_rv'2 failed.
Tue Jan 14 04:12:19 CET [netapp-EmB:bridge.removed:info]: FC-to_SAS bridge siteA_2:13.126L0 [ATTO FibreBridge6500N 1.61] S/N [FB7500N111167] was removed Tue Jan 14 04:12:19 CET [netapp-EmB:bridge.removed:info]: FC-to_SAS bridge siteA_2:5.126L0 [ATTO FibreBridge6500N 1.61] S/N [FB7500N111164] was removed Referring to the messages shown in the exhibit for each node, which component is causing the problem?

• A.the SAN switch siteB_2
• B.the ISL between siteA and site B
• C.the ATTO bridge on siteB_2
• D.the SAN switch siteA_2

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *