Is this how you should position switches in the ArubaOS-CX portfolio for data center networks?
Solution: Deploy Aruba 83xx switches as data center leaf switches.
A data center has a three-tier topology with ArubaOS-CX switches at each layer, is this a use case for implementing Virtual Switching Extension (VSX) at the core?
Solution: The customer wants to deploy a single control plane for the core fabric.
Two ArubaOS-CX switches ate part of a Virtual Switching Extension (V5X) fabric. Is this a guideline for configuring the switches' link-up delay settings?
Solution: The link-up delay timer is only required when split-recovery is disabled.
Refer to the exhibit. The company wants AtubaOS-CX switches to provide VXLAN services for several VMs and servers, as shown in the exhibit. Hypervisors will not run VXLAN for this solution. Is this part of a valid configuration to meet the requirements?
Solution: Work with the server admins to assign a consistent VLAN for VMs 1 and 4. Assign interface 1/1/2 on Switch-1 to the same VLAN.
Is this correct positioning of AtubaOS-CX switches in the data center?
Solution: Aruba CX 8325 switches are an appropriate choice for leaf switches in a leaf-spine topology that uses Virtual Extensible LAN (VXLAN) with Ethernet VPN (EVPN).
