CASE STUDY
Please use the following to answer the next question:
A mid-size US healthcare network has decided to develop an AI solution to detect a type of cancer that is most likely to arise in adults. Specifically, the healthcare network intends to create a recognition algorithm that will perform an initial review of all imaging and then route records to a radiologist for secondary review pursuant to agreed-upon criteria (e.g., a confidence score below a threshold).
To date, the healthcare network has:
- Defined its AI ethical principles.
- Conducted discovery to identify the intended uses and success
criteria for the system.
- Established an AI risk committee.
- Assembled a cross-functional team with clear roles and
responsibilities.
- Created policies and procedures to document standards, workflows,
timelines and risk thresholds during the project.
The healthcare network intends to retain a cloud provider to host the solution. It also intends to retain a large consulting firm to supplement its small data science team and help develop the algorithm using the healthcare network's existing data and de-identified data that is licensed from a large US clinical research partner.
Which stakeholder group is most important in selecting the specific type of algorithm?
Which of the following AI uses is best described as human-centric?
An artist has been using an Al tool to create digital art and would like to ensure that it has copyright protection in the United States.
Which of the following is most likely to enable the artist to receive copyright protection?
A shipping service based in the US is looking to expand its operations into the EU. It utilizes an in-house developed multimodal AI model that analyzes all personal data collected from shipping senders and recipients, and optimizes shipping routes and schedules based on this data.
As they expand into the EU, all of the following descriptions should be included in the technical documentation for their AI model EXCEPT?
CASE STUDY
Please use the following answer the next question:
A local police department in the United States procured an Al system to monitor and analyze social media feeds, online marketplaces and other sources of public information to detect evidence of illegal activities (e.g., sale of drugs or stolen goods). The Al system works by surveilling the public sites in order to identify individuals that are likely to have committed a crime. It cross-references the individuals against data maintained by law enforcement and then assigns a percentage score of the likelihood of criminal activity based on certain factors like previous criminal history, location, time, race and gender.
The police department retained a third-party consultant assist in the procurement process, specifically to evaluate two finalists. Each of the vendors provided information about their system's accuracy rates, the diversity of their training data and how their system works. The consultant determined that the first vendor's system has a higher accuracy rate and based on this information, recommended this vendor to the police department.
The police department chose the first vendor and implemented its Al system. As part of the implementation, the department and consultant created a usage policy for the system, which includes training police officers on how the system works and how to incorporate it into their investigation process.
The police department has now been using the Al system for a year. An internal review has found that every time the system scored a likelihood of criminal activity at or above 90%, the police investigation subsequently confirmed that the individual had, in fact, committed a crime. Based on these results, the police department wants to forego investigations for cases where the Al system gives a score of at least 90% and proceed directly with an arrest.
During the procurement process, what is the most likely reason that the third-party consultant asked each vendor for information about the diversity of their datasets?
