FreeQAs
 Request Exam  Contact
  • Home
  • View All Exams
  • New QA's
  • Upload
PRACTICE EXAMS:
  • Oracle
  • Fortinet
  • Juniper
  • Microsoft
  • Cisco
  • Citrix
  • CompTIA
  • VMware
  • SAP
  • EMC
  • PMI
  • HP
  • Salesforce
  • Other
  • Oracle
    Oracle
  • Fortinet
    Fortinet
  • Juniper
    Juniper
  • Microsoft
    Microsoft
  • Cisco
    Cisco
  • Citrix
    Citrix
  • CompTIA
    CompTIA
  • VMware
    VMware
  • SAP
    SAP
  • EMC
    EMC
  • PMI
    PMI
  • HP
    HP
  • Salesforce
    Salesforce
  1. Home
  2. Linux Foundation Certification
  3. CNPA Exam
  4. LinuxFoundation.CNPA.v2026-01-14.q30 Dumps
  • «
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Download Now

Question 26

A platform team wants to let developers provision cloud services like S3 buckets and databases using Kubernetes-native APIs, without exposing cloud-specific details. Which tool is best suited for this?

Correct Answer: B
Crossplane is the CNCF project designed to extend Kubernetes with the ability to provision and manage cloud resources via Kubernetes-native APIs. Option B is correct because Crossplane lets developers use familiar Kubernetes manifests to request resources like S3 buckets, databases, or VPCs while abstracting provider-specific implementation details. Platform teams can define compositions and abstractions, providing developers with golden paths that include organizational guardrails.
Option A (Cluster API) is focused on provisioning Kubernetes clusters themselves, not cloud services. Option C (Helm) manages Kubernetes application deployments but does not provision external infrastructure. Option D (OpenTofu) is a Terraform fork that provides IaC but is not Kubernetes-native.
By leveraging Crossplane, platform teams achieve infrastructure as data and full GitOps integration, empowering developers to provision services declaratively while ensuring governance and compliance.
References:- CNCF Crossplane Project Documentation- CNCF Platforms Whitepaper- Cloud Native Platform Engineering Study Guide
insert code

Question 27

In a GitOps approach, how should the desired state of a system be managed and integrated?

Correct Answer: D
The GitOps model is built on the principle that the desired state of infrastructure and applications must be stored in Git as the single source of truth. Option D is correct because Git provides versioning, immutability, and auditability, while reconciliation controllers (e.g., Argo CD or Flux) pull the desired state into the system continuously. This ensures that actual cluster state always matches the declared Git state.
Option A is partially correct but fails because GitOps eliminates manual push workflows-automation ensures changes are pulled and reconciled. Option B describes Kubernetes CRDs, which may be part of the system but do not embody GitOps on their own. Option C contradicts GitOps principles, which rely on pull- based reconciliation, not centralized push.
Storing desired state in Git provides full traceability, automated rollbacks, and continuous reconciliation, improving reliability and compliance. This makes GitOps a core practice for cloud native platform engineering.
References:- CNCF GitOps Principles- CNCF Platforms Whitepaper- Cloud Native Platform Engineering Study Guide
insert code

Question 28

A platform team is deciding whether to invest engineering time into automating cluster autoscaling. Which of the following best justifies making this automation a priority?

Correct Answer: A
Automation in platform engineering is primarily about reducing repetitive manual work, or toil, which consumes engineering capacity and increases the risk of human error. Option A is correct because cluster autoscaling-adjusting resources to meet workload demand-is a repetitive, ongoing task that is better handled through automation. Automating this process ensures scalability, efficiency, and reliability while freeing platform teams to focus on higher-value work.
Option B may provide learning opportunities but is not a sustainable justification. Option C is subjective and inefficient, while Option D is overly broad-automation should be applied thoughtfully to tasks that bring measurable benefits.
Automating autoscaling aligns with cloud native best practices, ensuring workloads can respond elastically to demand changes while maintaining cost efficiency. This reduces manual overhead, improves resiliency, and supports the developer experience by ensuring resource availability.
References:- CNCF Platforms Whitepaper- SRE Principles on Eliminating Toil- Cloud Native Platform Engineering Study Guide
insert code

Question 29

For a cloud native platform handling sensitive customer data, which approach ensures compliance with data privacy regulations like GDPR and PCI DSS within a Kubernetes environment?

Correct Answer: C
Compliance with regulations like GDPR and PCI DSS requires fine-grained control, auditing, and data protection. Option C is correct because deploying a policy engine like Open Policy Agent (OPA) enables dynamic enforcement of policies, real-time data masking, and comprehensive audit logging. This ensures sensitive data is protected while providing traceability and compliance reporting.
Option A is insufficient, as default IAM policies without Kubernetes-level governance do not provide the granularity required for compliance. Option B (Kubernetes Secrets) adds encryption but lacks auditability and runtime enforcement. Option D (RBAC and network policies) improves security posture but does not provide comprehensive compliance coverage or data privacy features like masking and logging.
OPA and similar tools integrate with Kubernetes admission control to enforce compliance policies consistently, providing the flexibility and auditability needed in regulated industries.
References:- CNCF Security TAG Best Practices- CNCF Platforms Whitepaper- Cloud Native Platform Engineering Study Guide
insert code

Question 30

Development teams frequently raise support tickets for short-term access to staging clusters, creating a growing burden on the platform team. What's the best long-term solution to balance control, efficiency, and developer experience?

Correct Answer: A
The most sustainable solution for managing developer access while balancing governance and self-service is to adopt GitOps-based RBAC management. Option A is correct because it leverages Git as the source of truth for access permissions, allowing developers to request access through pull requests. For non-sensitive environments such as staging, approvals can be automated, ensuring efficiency while still maintaining auditability. This approach aligns with platform engineering principles of self-service, automation, and compliance.
Option B places the burden entirely on one engineer, which does not scale. Option C introduces bottlenecks, delays, and reduces developer experience. Option D bypasses governance and auditability, potentially creating security risks.
GitOps for RBAC not only improves developer experience but also ensures all changes are versioned, reviewed, and auditable. This model supports compliance while reducing manual intervention from the platform team, thus enhancing efficiency.
References:- CNCF GitOps Principles- CNCF Platforms Whitepaper- Cloud Native Platform Engineering Study Guide
insert code
  • «
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
[×]

Download PDF File

Enter your email address to download LinuxFoundation.CNPA.v2026-01-14.q30 Dumps

Email:

FreeQAs

Our website provides the Largest and the most Latest vendors Certification Exam materials around the world.

Using dumps we provide to Pass the Exam, we has the Valid Dumps with passing guranteed just which you need.

  • DMCA
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
©2026 FreeQAs

www.freeqas.com materials do not contain actual questions and answers from Cisco's certification exams.