An organization has decided on a cloudhub migration strategy that aims to minimize the organizations own IT resources. Currently, the organizational has all of its Mule applications running on its own premises and uses an premises load balancer that exposes all APIs under the base URL https://api.acme.com As part of the migration strategy, the organization plans to migrate all of its Mule applications and load balancer to cloudhub What is the most straight-forward and cost effective approach to the Mule applications deployment and load balancing that preserves the public URLs?

• A.Deploy the Mule applications to Cloudhub
  Update the CNAME record for an api.acme.com in the organizations DNS server pointing to the A record of a cloudhub dedicated load balancer(DLB) Apply mapping rules in the DLB to map URLs to their corresponding Mule applications
• B.Deploy the Mule applications to Cloudhub
  Update the CNAME record for api.acme.com in the organization DNS server pointing to the A record of the cloudhub shared load balancer(SLB) Apply mapping rules in the SLB to map URLs to their corresponding Mule applications.
• C.Deploy the Mule applications to Cloudhub
  Create CNAME record for api.acme.com in the Cloudhub Shared load balancer (SLB) pointing to the A record of the on-premise load balancer Apply mapping rules in the SLB to map URLs to their corresponding Mule applications
• D.For each migrated Mule application, deploy an API proxy Mule application to Cloudhub with all applications under the control of a dedicated load balancer(CLB) Update the CNAME record for api.acme.com in the organization DNS server pointing to the A record of a cloudhub dedicated load balancer(DLB) Apply mapping rules in the DLB to map each API proxy application to its corresponding Mule applications

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

A global organization operates datacenters in many countries. There are private network links between these datacenters because all business data (but NOT metadata) must be exchanged over these private network connections.
The organization does not currently use AWS in any way.
The strategic decision has Just been made to rigorously minimize IT operations effort and investment going forward.
What combination of deployment options of the Anypoint Platform control plane and runtime plane(s) best serves this organization at the start of this strategic journey?

• A.Anypoint Platform - Private Cloud Edition Customer-hosted runtime plane in each datacenter
• B.MuleSoft-hosted Anypoint Platform control plane CloudHub Shared Worker Cloud in multiple AWS regions
• C.MuleSoft-hosted Anypoint Platform control plane Customer-hosted runtime plane in multiple AWS regions
• D.MuleSoft-hosted Anypoint Platform control plane Customer-hosted runtime plane in each datacenter Hybrid is the best choice to start. Mule hosted Control plane and Customer hosted Runtime to start with. Once they mature in cloud migration, everything can be in Mule hosted.

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

Refer to the exhibit.

A Mule application has an HTTP Listener that accepts HTTP DELETE requests. This Mule application Is deployed to three CloudHub workers under the control of the CloudHub Shared Load Balancer.
A web client makes a sequence of requests to the Mule application's public URL.
How is this sequence of web client requests distributed among the HTTP Listeners running in the three CloudHub workers?

• A.Each request Is routed to ONE ARBiTRARY CloudHub worker out of ALL three CloudHub workers
• B.Each request is routed to ONE ARBiTRARY CloudHub worker in the PRIMARY Availability Zone (AZ)
• C.Each request is routed to the PRIMARY CloudHub worker in the PRIMARY Availability Zone (AZ)
• D.Each request is routed (scattered) to ALL three CloudHub workers at the same time

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

What limits if a particular Anypoint Platform user can discover an asset in Anypoint Exchange?

• A.Design Center and RAML were both used to create the asset
• B.The existence of a public Anypoint Exchange portal to which the asset has been published
• C.The type of the asset in Anypoint Exchange
• D.The business groups to which the user belongs

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *

An organization is migrating all its Mule applications to Runtime Fabric (RTF). None of the Mule applications use Mule domain projects.
Currently, all the Mule applications have been manually deployed to a server group among several customer hosted Mule runtimes.
Port conflicts between these Mule application deployments are currently managed by the DevOps team who carefully manage Mule application properties files.
When the Mule applications are migrated from the current customer-hosted server group to Runtime Fabric (RTF), fo the Mule applications need to be rewritten and what DevOps port configuration responsibilities change or stay the same?

• A.Yes, the Mule applications Must be rewritten
  DevOps No Longer needs to manage port conflicts between the Mule applications
• B.NO, the Mule applications do NO need to be rewritten
  DevOps NO LONGER needs to manage port conflicts between the Mule applications.
• C.NO, The Mule applications do NOT need to be rewritten
  DevOps MUST STILL manage port conflicts
• D.Yes, the Mule applications Must be rewritten
  DevOps Must Still Manage port conflicts.

Comment: *

Name: *

Email: *

Verification: *